Boarding ICU patients: Are our rounding practices subpar?

Am J Surg

Division of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care, and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 51 N. 39th Street, MOB 1st Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. Electronic address:

Published: April 2018

AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Introduction: Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) patients "boarding" in ICUs other than the designated home unit have been shown to suffer increased rates of complications. We hypothesized that ICU rounding practices are different when SICU patients are housed in home vs. boarding ICUs.

Material And Methods: SICU rounds were observed at an academic quaternary medical center. Individual patient rounding time and order seen on rounds along with patient data and demographics were recorded. Multivariable regression analysis was used for comparison between patients.

Results: Non-boarders were older, observed on a later post ICU admission day and were more likely to be mechanically ventilated. Boarded patients were often seen at the end of rounds and for less time. Not being a boarder, age, APACHE II score on admission, vasopressor use, and positive pressure ventilation all predicted increased rounding time.

Conclusions: Surgical ICU patients boarding in non-preferred units are often seen at the end of rounds, result in a greater reliance upon telephone communication, and receive less bedside attention from ICU provider teams.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.04.019DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

icu patients
8
rounding practices
8
sicu patients
8
patients
5
boarding icu
4
rounding
4
patients rounding
4
practices subpar?
4
subpar? introduction
4
introduction surgical
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!