Modeling the Error of the Medtronic Paradigm Veo Enlite Glucose Sensor.

Sensors (Basel)

Institut d'Informàtica i Aplicacions, Universitat de Girona, Campus de Montilivi, s/n, Edifici P4, 17071 Girona, Spain.

Published: June 2017

Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) are prone to inaccuracy due to time lags, sensor drift, calibration errors, and measurement noise. The aim of this study is to derive the model of the error of the second generation Medtronic Paradigm Veo Enlite (ENL) sensor and compare it with the Dexcom SEVEN PLUS (7P), G4 PLATINUM (G4P), and advanced G4 for Artificial Pancreas studies (G4AP) systems. An enhanced methodology to a previously employed technique was utilized to dissect the sensor error into several components. The dataset used included 37 inpatient sessions in 10 subjects with type 1 diabetes (T1D), in which CGMs were worn in parallel and blood glucose (BG) samples were analyzed every 15 ± 5 min Calibration error and sensor drift of the ENL sensor was best described by a linear relationship related to the gain and offset. The mean time lag estimated by the model is 9.4 ± 6.5 min. The overall average mean absolute relative difference (MARD) of the ENL sensor was 11.68 ± 5.07% Calibration error had the highest contribution to total error in the ENL sensor. This was also reported in the 7P, G4P, and G4AP. The model of the ENL sensor error will be useful to test the in silico performance of CGM-based applications, i.e., the artificial pancreas, employing this kind of sensor.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5492301PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17061361DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

enl sensor
20
sensor
10
medtronic paradigm
8
paradigm veo
8
veo enlite
8
sensor drift
8
artificial pancreas
8
sensor error
8
calibration error
8
error
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!