Exploitation of the vulnerable in research: Responses to lessons learnt in history.

S Afr Med J

Steve Biko Centre for Bioethics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Published: May 2017

AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

The Nuremberg Trials raised insightful issues on how and why doctors who were trained in the Hippocratic tradition were able to commit such egregious and heinous medical crimes. The vulnerable were considered to be subhuman, of decreased intelligence, of no moral status and lacking human dignity. The reputation of the medical profession had been undermined, professionalism questioned and the doctor-patient relationship damaged as a result of the Nazi medical experiments. The World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki has been hailed as one of the most successful efforts in rescuing medical research from the darkness of the scandals and tragedies in health research. The first Research Ethics Committee in South Africa was established in 1966 at the University of the Witwatersrand. From the mid-1970s other institutions followed suit. The promulgation of the National Health Act No. 61 of 2003, in 2004, resulted in strong protectionism for research participants in the country.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2017.v107i6.12437DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

medical
5
exploitation vulnerable
4
vulnerable responses
4
responses lessons
4
lessons learnt
4
learnt history
4
history nuremberg
4
nuremberg trials
4
trials raised
4
raised insightful
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!