AI Article Synopsis

  • The journal Progress in Community Health Partnerships was created in 2007 to boost community-engaged research, and now its editors aim to establish new priorities for the next decade.
  • Researchers used a two-round Delphi process, where leaders in the field identified and ranked 90 key topics for community-engaged research based on their importance.
  • The top themes identified include enhancing equity among partners, ensuring sustainable partnerships, and translating research efforts into actionable policy changes.

Article Abstract

Background: In 2007 the journal Progress in Community Health Partnerships was launched to advance the field of community-engaged research and the journal's editors engaged in a Delphi process to identify priorities for the journal and field. Ten years later, the increased adoption of community-engaged research continues to improve public health.

Objectives: The purpose of this manuscrip t is to i dentify community-engaged research priorities for the next 10 years.

Methods: The study engaged leaders in community-engaged research using a two-round Delphi process, whereby leaders in the field were asked to identify and then rank order topics in community-engaged research that needed to be prioritized for the next decade.

Results: In stage 1, 41 respondents generated 441 priorities across 8 categories (e.g., theory, epidemiology, intervention science) that were collapsed into 90 priority topics, ranging from 8 to 15 per category. In stage 2, 73 respondents ranked five prioritized items for each category. The prioritized items are provided, with the following themes present across all categories: 1) improvements to equity among partners, 2) partnership sustainability, and 3) increased efforts to translate community-engaged research into policy change.

Conclusions: We compare the findings from this Delphi process with the priorities identified in 2007 to reflect on how the field has progressed. It is our hope that community and academic stakeholders will be able to use these priorities as a guide to their community-engaged research in the coming years.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2017.0002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

delphi process
12
stage respondents
8
prioritized items
8
community-engaged
7
priorities
5
years vision
4
vision forward
4
forward background
4
background 2007
4
2007 journal
4

Similar Publications

Introduction: The aim of this study was to establish an international consensus statement on the indications for the addition of a patellofemoral joint arthroplasty (PFJA) in patients with a unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) and symptomatic progression of patellofemoral compartment osteoarthritis.

Materials And Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted, and the results used to inform the development of a statement by an expert working group. This was then evaluated and modified, using a Delphi process, by members of the European Knee Society (EKS).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: A key challenge for many critical care clinical trials is that some patients will die before their outcome is fully measured. This is referred to as "truncation due to death" and must be accounted for in both the treatment effect definition (i.e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Seasonal vaccination is the mainstay of human influenza prevention. Licensed influenza vaccines are regularly updated to account for viral mutations and antigenic drift and are standardised for their haemagglutinin content. However, vaccine effectiveness remains suboptimal.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

With the publication of CALGB 140503, an increase in wedge resections for small, peripheral non-small cell lung cancer is expected; however, a relative paucity of data exists as to what defines a high quality oncologic wedge resection. The Thoracic Surgery Outcomes Research Network (ThORN), through expert discussion, guided by review of what limited data does exist, and through use of a modified Delphi process, provides these consensus statements defining an oncologically sound, high quality wedge resection. The statements are classified into five categories: 1) Preoperative Considerations 2) Technical Aspects 3) Lymph Node Assessment 4) Margin Assessment and 5) Tissue Handling by Pathology.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To validate Palestine's previously derived emergency department quality standards (EDQS) using an e-Delphi survey. A two-round e-Delphi survey validated the EDQS, developed in an earlier study through a literature review and consensus-building among Palestinian emergency medicine and healthcare quality experts. The study purposively sampled 53 emergency department and healthcare quality experts with over 5 years of experience.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!