Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2017.05.020 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Miniaccess Heart Surgery. A Spanish Multicenter Registry.
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed)
July 2018
Servicio de Cirugía Cardiaca, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain.
Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis.
Ann Thorac Surg
September 2013
Department of Adult Cardiac Surgery, G. Pasquinucci Heart Hospital, Gabriele Monasterio Foundation, Massa, Italy.
Background: The study aimed to compare the short-term results of aortic valve replacement through minimally invasive and sternotomy approaches.
Methods: This is a retrospective, observational, cohort study of prospectively collected data on 709 patients undergoing isolated primary aortic valve replacement between 2004 and 2011. Of these, 338 were performed through either right anterior minithoracotomy or upper ministernotomy.
Minimally invasive single-vessel coronary artery bypass with the internal thoracic artery and early postoperative angiography: midterm results of a prospective study in 120 consecutive patients.
Ann Thorac Surg
February 2002
Department of Cardiopneumology, Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Background: This prospective study was undertaken to determine the role of the minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass with early postoperative angiography and midterm follow-up in 120 consecutive patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease.
Methods: Minimal access (6 to 10 cm), without complete sternotomy and no cardiopulmonary bypass, was used. The lesions were located at the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery in 95% of the patients.
Haemolysis due to active venous drainage during cardiopulmonary bypass: comparison of two different techniques.
Perfusion
July 2001
Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Department, Instituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy.
To facilitate mini-access for cardiac surgery, two different methods of active venous drainage are used: vacuum assisted drainage and centrifugal pump aspiration on the venous line. The aim of this study was to compare the haemolysis produced using these two techniques. From June to December 1999, 50 consecutive patients were operated on using a ministernotomy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!