Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The objective of the study was to compare safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban and dabigatran with warfarin in treatment of patients with acute venous thromboembolic complications (VTEC). The authors analysed the results of examining and treating a total of 95 patients presenting with VTEC and randomly divided into three groups. In all groups the initial anticoagulant therapy consisted in unfractionated heparin administered for 5 days, after which the patients followed by switching were switched to a 6-month course of treatment with oral anticoagulants. Patients from Group One received warfarin, Group Two patients were treated with dabigatran etexilate, and Group Three patients were treated with rivaroxaban. Relapses of the disease were diagnosed in 2 (5.7%) patients from Group One. Haemorrhagic complications were noted in 8 (22.9%) Group One patients, in 3 (10%) Group Two patients and in 2 (6.7%) Group Three patients. After the end of treatment, complete recanalization of the thrombosed veins was revealed 13 (37.1%) patients from Group One, in 15 (50%) patients from Group Two and in 14 (46.7%) patients from Group Three. One year after the end of treatment, freedom from chronic venous insufficiency was observed in 8 (23.3%) patients of Group One, in 12 (40%) patients of Group Two and in 11 (36.6%) patients of Group Three. The composite quality of life indices after the treatment course were (appeared to be) higher in Group Two and Three patients compared with those of Group One. Hence, a conclusion was drawn that dabigatran and rivaroxaban turned out to be superior by efficacy and safety to warfarin in treatment of this patient cohort. No statistically significant differences were observed while comparing dabigatran and rivaroxaban.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!