Background: Treatment modalities for rectal cancer, including radiation, are associated with urinary adverse effects.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of surgery and radiation therapy for rectal cancer on long-term urinary complications.
Design: Using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare data set from the United States, patients with rectal cancer older than 66 years of age who underwent rectal resection between 1992 and 2007 were stratified into treatment groups that accounted for surgical resection and the timing of radiation therapy, if used. A control group of patients who did not have rectal cancer were matched by age, sex, demographics, and comorbidities. The primary outcome was a urinary adverse event defined as a relevant urinary diagnosis with an associated procedure. Patients with rectal cancer in different treatment groups were compared with control patients using a propensity-adjusted, multivariable Cox regression analysis.
Settings: The study was conducted with the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare data set from the United States at our institution.
Results: Of the 11,068 patients with rectal cancer, 56.2% had surgical resection alone, 21.7% received preoperative radiation, and 22.1% received postoperative radiation. The median follow-up for all of the groups of patients was >2 years. All of the groups of patients with rectal cancer were more likely to develop a urinary adverse event compared with control subjects. Adjusted HRs were 2.28 (95% CI, 2.02-2.57) for abdominoperineal resection alone, 2.24 (95% CI, 1.79-2.80) for preoperative radiation and surgical resection, 2.04 (95% CI, 1.70-2.44) for surgical resection and postoperative radiation, and 1.69 (95% CI, 1.52-1.89) for low anterior resection alone.
Limitations: Treatment patterns are somewhat outdated, with a large proportion of patients receiving postoperative radiation. The data did not allow for accurate assessment of urinary tract infections or mild urinary retention that is not managed with a procedure.
Conclusions: Rectal cancer surgery with or without radiation is associated with a higher risk of urinary complications requiring procedures. Patients who undergo low anterior resection without radiation tend toward the lowest risk for a urinary adverse event.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000788 | DOI Listing |
J Surg Oncol
January 2025
Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Background And Objectives: Little is known about the relationship between neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and perioperative morbidity for patients undergoing combined resection of rectal cancer and sLM. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of NAC on 30-day morbidity for patients who undergo combined resection of primary rectal cancer and sLM.
Materials And Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing combined resection of primary rectal cancer and sLM between 2016 and 2020 at participating NSQIP hospitals.
Am J Cancer Res
December 2024
Department of Ultrasound, The Second People's Hospital, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Fuzhou 350003, Fujian, China.
Background: Ultra-low rectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) presents technical challenges due to anatomical features. The objective of this research was to determine the risk factors linked to unsuccessful curative resections and to create a nomogram predictive model to assess the likelihood of encountering technical challenges.
Methods: Patients with ultra-low rectal tumors received ESD form June 2017 to December 2022 were retrospectively enrolled.
Am J Cancer Res
December 2024
Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan.
This multicenter study explored the survival benefits of upfront primary tumor resection (PTR) followed by first-line cetuximab plus chemotherapy in real-world patients with wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Treatment options for mCRC include chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and surgery. The efficacy of upfront PTR in managing mCRC remains unclear.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTher Adv Gastrointest Endosc
January 2025
Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Seoul 03722, Korea.
Background: Colonoscopic polypectomy significantly reduces the incidence of colorectal cancer, but it carries potential risks, with colonic perforation being the most common and associated with significant morbidity.
Objectives: This study evaluated the clinical outcomes and risk factors of microperforation during colonoscopic polypectomy.
Design: A retrospective cohort study.
Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol
December 2024
Department of General Surgery, King Hamad University Hospital, Muharraq, Bahrain.
Background: Colorectal metastasis from primary breast cancer is rare and presents a challenge for diagnosis and treatment.
Aim: To report two cases of colorectal metastasis from a primary invasive lobular breast carcinoma (ILBC) with different presentations while discussing the mode of diagnosis, immunohistochemistry (IHC), course of treatment, and response.
Case 1: A 47-year-old female, with a known case of bilateral invasive lobular breast cancer, was diagnosed in 2015 and staged as p Tx N3 M0.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!