Vitreomacular adhesion (VMA) represents a prognostic biomarker in the management of exudative macular disease using anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents. However, manual evaluation of VMA in 3D optical coherence tomography (OCT) is laborious and data on its impact on therapy of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) are limited. The aim of this study was to (1) develop a fully automated segmentation algorithm for the posterior vitreous boundary and (2) to study the effect of VMA on anti-VEGF therapy for RVO. A combined machine learning/graph cut segmentation algorithm for the posterior vitreous boundary was designed and evaluated. 391 patients with central/branch RVO under standardized ranibizumab treatment for 6/12 months were included in a systematic post-hoc analysis. VMA (70%) was automatically differentiated from non-VMA (30%) using the developed method combined with unsupervised clustering. In this proof-of-principle study, eyes with VMA showed larger BCVA gains than non-VMA eyes (BRVO: 15 ± 12 vs. 11 ± 11 letters, p = 0.02; CRVO: 18 ± 14 vs. 9 ± 13 letters, p < 0.01) and received a similar number of retreatments. However, this association diminished after adjustment for baseline BCVA, also when using more fine-grained VMA classes. Our study illustrates that machine learning represents a promising path to assess imaging biomarkers in OCT.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5462785 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02971-y | DOI Listing |
J Mark Access Health Policy
December 2024
Biometrics Research Group, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium;
Modern mediation analysis techniques supplement the primary intention-to-treat analysis with the aim to shed light onto the treatment mechanism. We investigate to what extent the anatomic marker vitreomacular adhesion resolution (VMAR) mediates vision benefits, comparing ocriplasmin vs. a sham regimen.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRetina
November 2024
Technical University of Munich (TUM), Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Purpose: To evaluate OCT features for vitreomacular traction (VMT) release and change in macular hole (MH) size after treatment with ocriplasmin.
Methods: Patients who had undergone treatment with ocriplasmin for VMT with or without MH ≤400 µm were included. The main outcomes were VMT release and changes in minimum linear diameter MH size at 4 weeks in MHs that persisted.
Int Ophthalmol
September 2024
Department of Ophthalmology, Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Purpose: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of vitreomacular interface disorders (VMID) on treatment response in patients treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) due to diabetic macular edema (DME).
Methods: Three hundred seventy-seven eyes of 239 patients in the MARMASIA Study Group who received intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment (IVT) due to DME were included in the study. The group 1 consisted of 44 eyes of the patients who had not received any treatment before, were followed up regularly for 24 months after at least a 3-month loading dose, and suffered from VMID such as epiretinal membrane, vitreomacular adhesion or traction, and lamellar hole.
Cureus
August 2024
Second Department of Ophthalmology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the prevalence of vitreoretinal interface (VRI) disorders in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and to evaluate the impact of VRI abnormalities on the treatment outcomes of macular edema secondary to RVO using intravitreal aflibercept.
Methods: Participants in this prospective study were consecutive patients with macular edema secondary to RVO, who received intravitreal aflibercept injections. At baseline, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed, and spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) was performed to measure central subfield thickness (CST) and to evaluate the presence of VRI disorders, namely, vitreoretinal adhesion (VMA), vitreoretinal traction (VMT), epiretinal membrane (ERM), lamellar macular hole (LMH), and full-thickness macular hole (FTMH).
Surv Ophthalmol
August 2024
School of Optometry and Vision Science, Medicine & Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) assess the impact of disease on quality of life from the patient's perspective. Our purpose was to provide an overview of current PROMs used for vitreomacular interface disorders: macular hole, epiretinal membrane, and vitreomacular traction. We review the content coverage of all identified PROMs, assess them against quality-of-life issues as identified from earlier qualitative studies, and assess their psychometric quality (measurement properties).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!