Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Despite biochemical euthyroidism, some levothyroxine (L-T)-treated hypothyroid patients report persisting symptoms and some of these patients are tentatively treated with a combination of L-T and liothyronine (L-T). Combination therapy and the appropriate choice of blood tests to monitor treatment are highly debated among specialists and patients.
Aim: To evaluate whether measuring serum triiodothyronine (S-T) at baseline or during combination therapy can be used as an indicator of a positive effect from L-T/L-T combination therapy.
Materials And Methods: Observational retrospective study of patients ( = 42) with persisting symptoms of hypothyroidism despite L-T therapy who had normal TSH levels and did not have any comorbidities that could explain their symptoms. All were then treated with L-T/L-T combination therapy at a dose ratio of 17/1 according to European Thyroid Association guidelines. Based on patient-reported outcome, they were divided into responders and nonresponders.
Results: Five patients were lost to follow-up and thus excluded. At the 3-month follow-up, 11 were classified as nonresponders and 26 as responders. At 12 months these figures had changed to 13 (35%) and 24 (65%), respectively. When comparing responders versus nonresponders, no differences were seen at baseline or during follow-up in S-T and in free T estimates. Further, logistic regression showed no correlation between S-T and free T estimates and responder/nonresponder status.
Conclusion: Our data indicate that serum T measurements are not suitable to predict which patient will benefit from L-T/L-T combination therapy, and treatment response cannot be followed by repeated T measurements either.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5422753 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000454878 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!