A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Surgical Repair of Pleuroperitoneal Communication with Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis. | LitMetric

Background: Pleuroperitoneal communication is a serious complication in patients receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. However, few single-institutional reports discuss the details of pleuroperitoneal communication in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients regarding the intraoperative findings, postoperative course, and outcomes.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of consecutive pleuroperitoneal communication patients who were treated surgically from September 2008 to March 2016.

Results: All four patients had right-sided hydrothorax. The time from introduction of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis to the diagnosis of hydrothorax ranged from 1 to 12 months (average: 5.5 months). Case 1 and case 4 had bleblike lesions near the center of the diaphragm; case 2 had a small hole located near the cardiophrenic angle, and case 3 had thinning of the diaphragm near the cardiophrenic angle. All lesions except for case 3 were directly closed with absorbable suture and reinforced by fibrin glue and a polyglycolic acid sheet. In case 3, the thinned diaphragm was reinforced using fibrin glue, a sealing sheet, and pericardial fat pad tissue. Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis was reinitiated an average period of 11 days (range: 4-15 days) postoperatively. During postoperative follow-up, there was no recurrence of hydrothorax. Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis was continued for an average of 16.7 months (range: 3-34 months) after surgical treatment.

Conclusions: Surgical treatment for pleuroperitoneal communication is a safe and acceptable procedure and could greatly benefit continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603621DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

continuous ambulatory
28
ambulatory peritoneal
28
peritoneal dialysis
28
pleuroperitoneal communication
20
communication continuous
8
dialysis patients
8
cardiophrenic angle
8
reinforced fibrin
8
fibrin glue
8
continuous
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!