The aim of this work is to assess the performance of 2D time-integrated (2D-TI), 2D time-resolved (2D-TR) and 3D time-integrated (3D-TI) portal dosimetry in detecting dose discrepancies between the planned and (simulated) delivered dose caused by simulated changes in the anatomy of lung cancer patients. For six lung cancer patients, tumor shift, tumor regression and pleural effusion are simulated by modifying their CT images. Based on the modified CT images, time-integrated (TI) and time-resolved (TR) portal dose images (PDIs) are simulated and 3D-TI doses are calculated. The modified and original PDIs and 3D doses are compared by a gamma analysis with various gamma criteria. Furthermore, the difference in the D (ΔD ) of the GTV is calculated and used as a gold standard. The correlation between the gamma fail rate and the ΔD is investigated, as well the sensitivity and specificity of all combinations of portal dosimetry method, gamma criteria and gamma fail rate threshold. On the individual patient level, there is a correlation between the gamma fail rate and the ΔD , which cannot be found at the group level. The sensitivity and specificity analysis showed that there is not one combination of portal dosimetry method, gamma criteria and gamma fail rate threshold that can detect all simulated anatomical changes. This work shows that it will be more beneficial to relate portal dosimetry and DVH analysis on the patient level, rather than trying to quantify a relationship for a group of patients. With regards to optimizing sensitivity and specificity, different combinations of portal dosimetry method, gamma criteria and gamma fail rate should be used to optimally detect certain types of anatomical changes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aa7730 | DOI Listing |
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol
October 2024
University of Newcastle, University Drive, Newcastle, 2308, New South Wales, Australia.
The aim of this work was to evaluate results of a remote electronic portal imaging based dosimetric auditing method using Task-Group 218 clinical gamma evaluation criteria (3%,2 mm, 10% dose threshold). For intensity modulated radiation therapy the results were (mean ± 1 SD) 97.9 ± 4.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Med Inform Decis Mak
December 2024
Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, P. R. China.
Background: The low tube-voltage technique (e.g., 80 kV) can efficiently reduce the radiation dose and increase the contrast enhancement of vascular and parenchymal structures in abdominal CT.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRadiol Med
December 2024
Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, A.O.U. Città Della Salute e della Scienza Di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of baseline clinical features and treatment procedure, including liver function measured with albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) formula and dosing methods in HCC patients treated with SIRT.
Material And Methods: The study includes 82 consecutive patients with liver-dominant HCC treated with SIRT (Y glass microspheres, TheraSphereTM) between October 2014 and September 2023. Twenty-five patients were treated with standard dosimetry, while for remaining patients, multi-compartment dosimetry was performed using Simplicit90YTM software.
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol
October 2024
Servei de Radiofisica i Radioprotecció, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Background And Purpose: With the availability of commercial electronic portal imaging detector-based in vivo dosimetry (EPID-based IVD) solutions, many radiotherapy departments are adopting this technology. However, comprehensive commissioning guidance is lacking. This study aims to provide a protocol for testing the accuracy and sensitivity of EPID-based IVD systems.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCancers (Basel)
November 2024
Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), 34090 Montpellier, France.
: To evaluate an end-to-end pipeline for normo-fractionated prostate-only and whole-pelvic cancer treatments that requires minimal human input and generates a machine-deliverable plan as an output. : In collaboration with TheraPanacea, a treatment planning pipeline was developed that takes as its input a planning CT with organs-at-risk (OARs) and planning target volume (PTV) contours, the targeted linac machine, and the prescription dose. The primary components are (i) dose prediction by a single deep learning model for both localizations and (ii) a direct aperture VMAT plan optimization that seeks to mimic the predicted dose.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!