Objective: The purpose of this prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical study was to analyze the optical effects of an anodized pink colored implant shoulder/abutment system in the peri-implant mucosa of immediately placed dental implants.

Materials And Method: Forty subjects with a restoratively hopeless tooth in the maxillary esthetic zone, were recruited and randomized to receive either a pink-neck implant, or a conventional gray implant. All patients received an immediate implant and immediate provisional and two identical CAD/CAM titanium abutments with different surface colors: pink and gray, and one zirconia all-ceramic crown. The color of the peri-implant mucosa was measured using a dental spectrophotometer and analyzed using CIELAB color system.

Results: The overall color difference between the peri-implant mucosa with a pink abutment and a gray abutment was ΔE = 4.22. Patients with gray implants presented a color change of ΔE = 3.86-4.17 with this abutment change, while patients with pink implants had a color change of ΔE = 3.84-4.69. The peri-implant mucosa with a pink abutment was significantly more red when compared with a gray abutment (P ≤ .01).

Conclusions: When a pink abutment was used, there is a significant color change of the peri-implant mucosa that is above the detectable color threshold.

Clinical Significance: Esthetic outcomes are important for the success of implant treatment of maxillary anterior implants. The phenomenon of the gray color of a dental implant and abutment shining through the peri-implant mucosa has been documented in the literature. The objective of this study was to assess the optical effect of an anodized pink-neck implant and a pink abutment on the color of peri-implant mucosa. This study demonstrates that using pink-neck implant and a pink abutment would contribute positively to the overall esthetic outcome for an anterior implant.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12309DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

peri-implant mucosa
28
pink abutment
20
pink-neck implant
12
color change
12
pink
10
implant
9
color
9
abutment
9
assess optical
8
color peri-implant
8

Similar Publications

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a combination of immediate implant placement with maxillary sinus augmentation (MSA) solely using platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) on guided bone regeneration.

Materials And Methods: An interventional before-after (pre-post) study design was used with 30 dental patients (≥18 years of age; 14 males and 16 females) with initial bone heights ranging between 4 and 6 mm. Following the general check-up and the creation of a study model, the planned implant location demonstrated an external right maxilla diameter of more than 5 mm, thereby validating the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) radiograph.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The preoperative fabrication of well-contoured, computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM), custom healing abutments is essential for guiding soft tissue healing and saving chairside time. This dental technique involves a fully digital workflow to fabricate a CAD-CAM custom healing abutment that relies on preoperative digital implant planning. The healing abutment is designed with an optimal emergence profile that can predictably direct the anatomy of the peri-implant mucosa.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

It is well known that keratinized mucosa (KM) plays a crucial role for maintaining peri implant health and esthetic outcomes. The Strip Gingival Graft (SGG) technique, which involved an apically positioned flap (APF), in combination with an autogenous SGG and a xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM), demonstrated its efficacy in re-establishing an adequate amount of KM width at implant sites. Nevertheless, it is still unclear whether harvesting the SGG from the palate (pSGG) or from the buccal aspect of natural dentition (bSGG) affects the esthetic outcomes at the augmented implant sites.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Bone augmentation procedures often leads to coronal displacement of the mucogingival junction, a deficiency of keratinized mucosa, and a reduction in soft tissue height. These challenges complicate the achievement of an ideal peri-implant phenotype. It is known that addressing both the quantity and quality of soft tissue is crucial for the long-term success and aesthetics of implants.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comparison of a non-grafted socket shield technique with guided bone regeneration in immediate implant placement: a randomized clinical trial.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg

December 2024

Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Kutahya Health Sciences University, Kutahya, Turkey. Electronic address:

The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare a non-grafted socket shield technique (SST) with simultaneous guided bone regeneration (GBR) in immediate implant placement in terms of clinical, aesthetic, and radiographic parameters. Patients with an unrestorable tooth in the maxillary aesthetic region were included. The patients were randomized to SST and GBR groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!