Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The automatic metabolic units calculate breath-by-breath gas exchange from the expiratory data only, applying an algorithm ('expiration-only' algorithm) that neglects the changes in the lung gas stores. These last are theoretically taken into account by a recently proposed algorithm, based on an alternative view of the respiratory cycle ('alternative respiratory cycle' algorithm). The performance of the two algorithms was investigated where changes in the lung gas stores were induced by abrupt increases in ventilation above the physiological demand. Oxygen, carbon dioxide fractions and ventilatory flow were recorded at the mouth in 15 healthy subjects during quiet breathing and during 20-s hyperventilation manoeuvres performed at 5-min intervals in resting conditions. Oxygen uptakes and carbon dioxide exhalations were calculated throughout the acquisition periods by the two algorithms. Average ventilation amounted to 6·1 ± 1·4 l min during quiet breathing and increased to 41·8 ± 27·2 l min during the manoeuvres (P<0·01). During quiet breathing, the two algorithms provided overlapping gas exchange data and noise. Conversely, during hyperventilation, the 'alternative respiratory cycle' algorithm provided significantly lower gas exchange data as compared to the values yielded by the 'expiration-only' algorithm. For the first breath of hyperventilation, the average values provided by the two algorithms amounted to 0·37 ± 0·34 l min versus 0·96 ± 0·73 l min for O uptake and 0·45 ± 0·36 l min versus 0·80 ± 0·58 l min for exhaled CO (P<0·001 for both). When abrupt increases in ventilation occurred, such as those arising from a deep breath, the 'alternative respiratory cycle' algorithm was able to halve the artefactual gas exchange values as compared to the 'expiration-only' approach.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12444 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!