Early infectious outcomes after addition of fluoroquinolone or aminoglycoside to posttrauma antibiotic prophylaxis in combat-related open fracture injuries.

J Trauma Acute Care Surg

From the San Antonio Military Medical Center (B.A.L., C.K.M., D.M.B.), Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, Texas; Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Preventive Medicine & Biostatistics Department (F.S., M.L.C.), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland; Landstuhl Regional Medical Center (E.R.S.), Landstuhl, Germany; Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (T.J.W.), Bethesda, Maryland; and Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Preventive Medicine & Biostatistics Department (D.R.T.), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.

Published: November 2017

Background: We examined combat-related open extremity fracture infections as a function of whether posttrauma antimicrobial prophylaxis included expanded Gram-negative (EGN) coverage.

Methods: Military personnel with open extremity fractures sustained in Iraq and Afghanistan (2009-2014) who transferred to participating hospitals in the United States were assessed. The analysis was restricted to patients with a U.S. hospitalization period of ≥7 days. Prophylaxis was classified as narrow (e.g., IV cefazolin, clindamycin, and/or amoxicillin-clavulanate) or EGN, if the prophylactic regimen included fluoroquinolones and/or aminoglycosides.

Results: The study population included 1,044 patients, of which 585 (56%) and 459 (44%) received narrow and EGN coverage, respectively (p < 0.001). Skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) were more common among patients who received narrow prophylaxis compared to EGN coverage (28% vs. 22%; p = 0.029), whereas osteomyelitis rates were comparable between regimens (8%). Similar findings were noted when endpoints were measured at 2 and 4 weeks postinjury. There was no significant difference related to length of hospitalization between narrow and EGN regimens (median: 34 and 32 days, respectively) or operating room visits (median: 5 and 4). A higher proportion of EGN coverage patients had Gram-negative organisms isolated that were not susceptible to fluoroquinolones and/or aminoglycosides (49% vs. 40%; p < 0.001). In a Cox proportional model, narrow prophylaxis was independently associated with an increased risk of extremity SSTIs (hazard ratio: 1.41; 95% confidence interval: 1.09-1.83).

Discussion: Despite seeing a small benefit with EGN coverage related to a reduction of SSTIs, it does not decrease the risk of osteomyelitis, and there seems to be a cost of increased antibiotic resistance associated with use. Overall, our findings support the current post-combat trauma antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines, which recommend the use of cefazolin or clindamycin with open fractures.

Level Of Evidence: Prognostic/Epidemiological, Level II; Therapy, level IV.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5656510PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001609DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

egn coverage
16
antibiotic prophylaxis
8
combat-related open
8
open extremity
8
cefazolin clindamycin
8
fluoroquinolones and/or
8
received narrow
8
narrow egn
8
narrow prophylaxis
8
egn
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!