A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Kinship by isonymy and by gene frequencies: A comparison of population structures at different hierarchical population levels. | LitMetric

Kinship by isonymy and by gene frequencies: A comparison of population structures at different hierarchical population levels.

Am J Hum Biol

Dipartimento di Scienze del Comportamento Animale e dell'Uomo, Sezione di Antropologia, Università degli Studi di Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.

Published: January 1996

A comparison of population structures based on isonymy and on gene frequencies (ABO, Rh, Kell) was conducted for a sample of 28,205 individuals residing in three different provinces (Lucca, Massa Carrara, La Spezia) in northwest Italy, on the basis of both chronological and spatial subgroupings. Relationships between and within population subsamples were measured by means of kinship coefficients. The aim of this study was focused on kinship decay with geographic distance, associated with the great difference in location and variability between isonymic and genetic data. The analysis was carried out by R statistics and regression analysis to test the fit of the isolation by distance models. Further, the R matrices were converted into a distance measure, and Mantel's permutation test was used to assess the correlation across isonymy, genetic, and geographic matrices. Whereas estimates of R and isolation by distance parameters obtained from genetic and surname data pointed to a roughly comparable basic pattern of spatial differentiation in both chronological periods, the absolute values differ substantially. Both R and a isolation by distance parameters estimated from genetic data were higher than those from surnames, indicating greater local isolation by genetic analysis. The standard errors of b obtained from surname data were much smaller than those computed from genetic data, indicating that the kinship by isonymy coefficients fit Malècot's model better than the kinship coefficients estimated by the genetic data. Squared correlation coefficients among geographic, surname, and genetic distance matrices supported the above interpretations. The strong localization of surnames, the different level of variability in surname and gene frequency data, and random variations (due to the number of alleles considered) seem to be the main reasons for the observed differences between the two data sets. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6300(1996)8:4<445::AID-AJHB4>3.0.CO;2-XDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

genetic data
16
isolation distance
12
kinship isonymy
8
isonymy gene
8
gene frequencies
8
comparison population
8
population structures
8
kinship coefficients
8
genetic
8
data
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!