A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

LIFETIME REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS AND THE OPPORTUNITY FOR SELECTION IN A NONTERRITORIAL DAMSELFLY (ODONATA: COENAGRIONIDAE). | LitMetric

LIFETIME REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS AND THE OPPORTUNITY FOR SELECTION IN A NONTERRITORIAL DAMSELFLY (ODONATA: COENAGRIONIDAE).

Evolution

Program in Evolutionary Ecology and Behavior, Department of Biology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242.

Published: July 1986

Major components of male and female lifetime reproductive success (LRS) were quantified for a damselfly that exhibits "scramble competition" for mates. The opportunity for selection on male reproduction was potentially 2.9 times that for females. Differential fertility/clutch and survivorship each accounted for about half of the total variation in female reproductive success. Variation in fertilization efficiency accounted for 7% of the total opportunity for selection on males. Although differences in survivorship and mating efficiency each contributed to about a third of the total opportunity for selection on male reproduction, both components appeared to be influenced by random factors. Survivorship was age-independent, and the mating distributions among males with equal mating opportunities were indistinguishable from those expected if matings were random with respect to male phenotype. Because the proportion of the standarized variance (I) in LRS that was attributed to sexual selection depended on the way the selective episodes were defined, the sample of individuals included in the partitioning analysis, and the degree of sexual selection on mated males that could be detected, my results caution against drawing conclusions about the dynamics of sexual selection on populations based on a superficial comparison of I values.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb00539.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

opportunity selection
16
reproductive success
12
sexual selection
12
lifetime reproductive
8
selection male
8
male reproduction
8
total opportunity
8
selection
7
opportunity
4
success opportunity
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!