Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequent malignancy and the second cause of death from malignancy in men in the Western world. Prostatic Specific Antigen (PSA) has been widely used as a possible marker for PCa for the last three decades, but its significant limitations are known, especially its lack of an exact cutoff level for diagnosis of PCa. Imprudent use of PSA has led to over-diagnosis and over-treatment in men with low risk PCa, not significant for survival. Therefore, researchers are looking for better and more accurate markers for diagnosis, treatment decisions and follow-up. In this article we review the various markers for PCa, especially two recent ones, their development process and validation results. The two markers are molecularbased and may provide an accurate and practical answer to important clinical questions: (1) In which patient with negative prostate biopsy should we repeat the biopsy? Can we locate the region of major risk? (2) Which patient diagnosed with low to moderate risk of PCa needs immediate treatment vs. active surveillance?
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!