If many changes are necessary to improve the quality of neuroscience research, one relatively simple step could have great pay-offs: to promote the adoption of detailed graphical methods, combined with robust inferential statistics. Here, we illustrate how such methods can lead to a much more detailed understanding of group differences than bar graphs and t-tests on means. To complement the neuroscientist's toolbox, we present two powerful tools that can help us understand how groups of observations differ: the shift function and the difference asymmetry function. These tools can be combined with detailed visualisations to provide complementary perspectives about the data. We provide implementations in R and MATLAB of the graphical tools, and all the examples in the article can be reproduced using R scripts.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13610DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

graphical methods
8
differences robust
4
robust graphical
4
methods compare
4
compare groups
4
groups neuroscience
4
neuroscience changes
4
changes improve
4
improve quality
4
quality neuroscience
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!