AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates how occupational noise and vibration affect workers' health, specifically headaches and eyestrain, using data from a large survey of 25,751 workers.
  • The results revealed that workers exposed to higher levels of noise and vibration reported more headaches/eyestrain, with noise exposure having a stronger correlation.
  • The combination of both noise and vibration exposures showed enhanced predictive power for headaches/eyestrain compared to either factor alone.

Article Abstract

Introduction: The individual and combined effect of occupational noise and vibration exposures, on workers' health has not been thoroughly investigated. In order to find better ways to prevent and manage workers' headache, this study aimed to investigate the effects of occupational noise and vibration exposure on headache/eyestrain.

Methods: We used data from the fourth Korean Working Condition Survey (2014). After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 25,751 workers were included. Occupational noise and vibration exposure and the prevalence of headache/eyestrain were investigated by self-reported survey. Chi-square tests were used to compare differences in baseline characteristics between the group with headache/eyestrain and the group without. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using a logistic regression model adjusted for several covariates. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) analysis was used to evaluate the effect of occupational noise and/or vibration exposure.

Results: Among the 25,751 study subjects, 4,903 had experienced headache/eyestrain in the preceding year. There were significant differences in age, education level, household income, occupational classification, shift work, occupational vibration exposure, and occupational noise exposure between the two groups (all p<0.05). The odds ratios between each exposure and headache/eyestrain increased proportionally with the level of exposure, increasing from 1.08 to 1.26 with increasing vibration exposure, and from 1.25 to 1.41 with increasing noise exposure. According to the AUROC analysis, the predictive power of each exposure was significant, and increased when the two exposures were considered in combination.

Discussion: The findings of this study show that both occupational noise and vibration exposures are associated with headache/eyestrain; noise exposure more strongly so. However, when the two exposures are considered in combination, the explanatory power for headache/eyestrain is increased. Therefore, efforts aimed at reducing and managing occupational noise and vibration exposure are crucial to maintaining workers' health.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5441589PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0177846PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

occupational noise
24
noise vibration
16
vibration exposure
16
fourth korean
8
korean working
8
working condition
8
condition survey
8
occupational
7
noise
6
vibration
6

Similar Publications

Impacts of hazardous noise levels on hearing loss and tinnitus in dental professionals.

J Occup Med Toxicol

January 2025

School of Health Sciences, Department of Audiology, University of the Pacific, San Francisco, California, USA.

Background: Hazardous noise exposure is an important health concern in many workplaces and is one of the most common work-related injuries in the United States. Dental professionals are frequently exposed to high levels of occupational noise in their daily work environment. This noise is generated by various dental handpieces such as drills, suctions, and ultrasonic scalers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Tinnitus prevalence and associations with leisure noise exposure among Canadians, aged 6 to 79 years.

Int J Audiol

January 2025

Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, Canada.

Objective: To examine the association between individual, cumulative leisure noise exposure (CLNE), acceptable yearly exposure (AYE) and tinnitus among a nationally representative sample of Canadians.

Design: In-person household questionnaires were used to evaluate leisure noise exposure across age, sex, household income and tinnitus: ever experienced, previous year, frequent, bothersome. High (≥85 dBA, LEX), low (<85 dBA, LEX) CLNE and AYEs were defined according to occupational limits.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The noise levels in intensive care units usually exceed the recommended limits in (inter)national recommendations. Such noise levels can affect both the recovery of intensive care patients and the performance of staff. The aim of this study was to reduce ward-based noise levels in three intensive care units (anesthesiological, neurological, and neonatological).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Landscapers are exposed to noise, carbon monoxide (CO), respirable dust, and respirable crystalline silica (RCS) generated from the tools they use. Although engineering controls are available to reduce these exposures, no previous study has evaluated chronic exposures to landscapers in different work settings and compared exposures from landscaping tools with and without engineering controls. This field study of workers in the landscaping services industry documented the occupational exposures of 80 participants at 11 varied worksites to noise, CO, respirable dust, and RCS using personal breathing zone sampling.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Associations of Traumatic Brain Injury and Hearing: Results From the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Neurocognitive Study (ARIC-NCS).

J Head Trauma Rehabil

December 2024

Author Affiliations: Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Dr Schneider); Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Dr Schneider); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Kamath); Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland (Drs Reed, Sharrett, Lin, and Deal); The MIND Center, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi (Dr Mosley); National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Intramural Research Program, Bethesda, Maryland (Dr Gottesman); Department of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (Drs Lin and Deal); and Cochlear Center for Hearing and Public Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland (Drs Lin and Deal).

Objective: To examine associations of traumatic brain injury (TBI) with self-reported and clinical measures of hearing function.

Setting: Four US communities.

Participants: A total of 3176 Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study participants who attended the sixth study visit in 2016-2017, when hearing was assessed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!