AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to compare treatment outcomes for lung metastases from non-colorectal cancers using three ablation methods: laser-induced thermotherapy (LITT), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and microwave ablation (MWA).
  • A total of 175 ablation sessions were analyzed from 109 patients, with survival rates at 1-4 years showing MWA had the highest overall survival and progression-free survival rates compared to LITT and RFA.
  • MWA demonstrated the lowest recurrence rate of tumors, while common complications like pneumothorax occurred similarly across all methods, highlighting MWA's advantages in controlling local tumors and improving patient outcomes.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To retrospectively compare the local tumour response and survival rates in patients with non-colorectal cancer lung metastases post-ablation therapy using laser-induced thermotherapy (LITT), radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA).

Material And Methods: Retrospective analysis of 175 computed tomography (CT)-guided ablation sessions performed on 109 patients (43 males and 66 females, mean age: 56.6 years). Seventeen patients with 22 lesions underwent LITT treatment (tumour size: 1.2-4.8 cm), 29 patients with 49 lesions underwent RFA (tumour size: 0.8-4.5 cm) and 63 patients with 104 lesions underwent MWA treatment (tumour size: 0.6-5 cm). CT scans were performed 24-h post-therapy and on follow-up at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.

Results: The overall-survival rates at 1-, 2-, 3- and 4-year were 93.8, 56.3, 50.0 and 31.3% for patients treated with LITT; 81.5, 50.0, 45.5 and 24.2% for patients treated with RFA and 97.6, 79.9, 62.3 and 45.4% for patients treated with MWA, respectively. The mean survival time was 34.14 months for MWA, 34.79 months for RFA and 35.32 months for LITT. In paired comparison, a significant difference could be detected between MWA versus RFA (p = 0.032). The progression-free survival showed a median of 23.49 ± 0.62 months for MWA,19.88 ± 2.17 months for LITT and 16.66 ± 0.66 months for RFA (p = 0.048). The lowest recurrence rate was detected in lesions ablated with MWA (7.7%; 8 of 104 lesions) followed by RFA (20.4%; 10 of 49 lesions) and LITT (27.3%; 6 of 22 lesions) p value of 0.012. Pneumothorax was detected in 22.16% of MWA ablations, 22.73% of LITT ablations and 14.23% of RFA ablations.

Conclusion: LITT, RFA and MWA may provide an effective therapeutic option for non-colorectal cancer lung metastases with an advantage for MWA regarding local tumour control and progression-free survival rate.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2017.1306656DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

non-colorectal cancer
12
cancer lung
12
lung metastases
12
lesions underwent
12
tumour size
12
patients treated
12
rfa
10
litt
9
mwa
9
retrospective analysis
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!