AI Article Synopsis

  • The study assessed water quality at five river sites in the Parana River basin, Brazil, using fish biomarkers to determine environmental impact on public water supply.
  • Significant findings showed that Site 0 (an environmental protected area) had the best water quality indicators, while sites downstream (Site 1) and urban-affected sites (Sites 3 and 4) exhibited severe health impacts on fish, including histopathological alterations and genotoxicity.
  • Site 4 was notably the most polluted, characterized by high nitrogen, ammonia levels, and low oxygen, highlighting the critical need for improved water management in the region.

Article Abstract

In the current study, water quality of five river sites in Parana River basin (Brazil), utilized for public water supply, was assessed through a set of biomarkers in fish Astyanax spp. Population growth and inadequate use of land are challenges to the preservation of biodiversity and resources such as water. Some physicochemical parameters as well as somatic indexes, gills and liver histopathology, genotoxicity, and biochemical biomarkers were evaluated. The highest gonadosomatic index (GSI) and antioxidant parameters (catalase and glutathione S-transferase activities, non-protein thiols), as well as the lowest damage to biomolecules (lipid peroxidation, protein carbonylation, DNA damage) were observed in site 0 (Piava River), which is located at an environmental protected area. Site 1, located in the same river, but downstream site 0 and outside the protection area, presents some level of impact. Fish from site 2 (Antas River), which lack of riparian forest and suffer from silting, presented the highest micronucleus incidence and no melanomacrophages. Differently, individuals from site 3 (Xambrê River) and site 4 (Pinhalzinho River) which receive surface runoff from Umuarama city, urban and industrial sewage, have the highest incidences of liver and gill histopathological alterations, including neoplasia, which indicated the worst health conditions of all sites. In particular, site 4 had high levels of total nitrogen and ammonia, high turbidity, and very low oxygen levels, which indicate important chemical impact. Comparison of the biomarkers in fish allowed classification of the five sites in terms of environmental impact and revealed that sites 3 and 4 had particular poor water quality.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9186-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

river
8
parana river
8
river basin
8
astyanax spp
8
water quality
8
biomarkers fish
8
site
7
environmental risk
4
risk assessment
4
assessment rivers
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!