Background: Thanks to the advances in genomics and targeted treatments, more and more prediction models based on biomarkers are being developed to predict potential benefit from treatments in a randomized clinical trial. Despite the methodological framework for the development and validation of prediction models in a high-dimensional setting is getting more and more established, no clear guidance exists yet on how to estimate expected survival probabilities in a penalized model with biomarker-by-treatment interactions.
Methods: Based on a parsimonious biomarker selection in a penalized high-dimensional Cox model (lasso or adaptive lasso), we propose a unified framework to: estimate internally the predictive accuracy metrics of the developed model (using double cross-validation); estimate the individual survival probabilities at a given timepoint; construct confidence intervals thereof (analytical or bootstrap); and visualize them graphically (pointwise or smoothed with spline). We compared these strategies through a simulation study covering scenarios with or without biomarker effects. We applied the strategies to a large randomized phase III clinical trial that evaluated the effect of adding trastuzumab to chemotherapy in 1574 early breast cancer patients, for which the expression of 462 genes was measured.
Results: In our simulations, penalized regression models using the adaptive lasso estimated the survival probability of new patients with low bias and standard error; bootstrapped confidence intervals had empirical coverage probability close to the nominal level across very different scenarios. The double cross-validation performed on the training data set closely mimicked the predictive accuracy of the selected models in external validation data. We also propose a useful visual representation of the expected survival probabilities using splines. In the breast cancer trial, the adaptive lasso penalty selected a prediction model with 4 clinical covariates, the main effects of 98 biomarkers and 24 biomarker-by-treatment interactions, but there was high variability of the expected survival probabilities, with very large confidence intervals.
Conclusion: Based on our simulations, we propose a unified framework for: developing a prediction model with biomarker-by-treatment interactions in a high-dimensional setting and validating it in absence of external data; accurately estimating the expected survival probability of future patients with associated confidence intervals; and graphically visualizing the developed prediction model. All the methods are implemented in the R package biospear, publicly available on the CRAN.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5441049 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0354-0 | DOI Listing |
Arch Toxicol
December 2024
Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Sinnhuber Aquatic Research Laboratory, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97333, USA.
The constant emergence of new viral pathogens underscores the need for continually evolving, effective antiviral drugs. A key challenge is identifying compounds that are both efficacious and safe, as many candidates fail during development due to unforeseen toxicity. To address this, the embryonic zebrafish morphology, mortality, and behavior (ZBE) screen and the SYSTEMETRIC® Cell Health Screen (CHS) were employed to evaluate the safety of 403 compounds from the Cayman Antiviral Screening Library.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOper Orthop Traumatol
December 2024
Department for Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital LUKS, Spitalstrasse, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Objective: To maximize local tumor control, stabilize affected bones, and preserve or replace joints with minimal interventional burden, thereby enhancing quality of life for empowered living.
Indications: Suitable for patients with bone metastases, particularly those with severe pain and/or fractures and appropriate life expectancy.
Contraindications: In primary bone tumors, refer to the sarcoma surgery team for evaluation of wide resection.
Intensive Care Med Exp
December 2024
Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.
Background: Identifying spontaneous circulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is challenging. Current methods, which involve intermittent and time-consuming pulse checks, necessitate pauses in chest compressions. This issue is problematic in both in-hospital cardiac arrest and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest situations, where resources for identifying circulation during CPR may be limited.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCancer Genomics Proteomics
December 2024
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Background/aim: The development of new biomarkers to predict cancer patient prognosis is expected to aid in treatment selection, contributing to improved outcomes. In this study, we extracted a candidate gene associated with patient prognosis from a public database and investigated the molecular and biological functions and clinical significance of the gene in gastric cancer.
Materials And Methods: We analyzed The Cancer Genome Atlas database and identified the family with sequence similarity 32 member a (FAM32A) as a candidate gene.
JAMA Netw Open
December 2024
Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Importance: Radiotherapy (RT) plan quality is an established predictive factor associated with cancer recurrence and survival outcomes. The addition of radiologists to the peer review (PR) process may increase RT plan quality.
Objective: To determine the rate of changes to the RT plan with and without radiology involvement in PR of radiation targets.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!