AI Article Synopsis

  • This study focuses on improving cancer subtype classification to better predict outcomes and tailor treatments by using specific gene expression networks for each cancer type, rather than a generic approach.
  • Researchers integrated somatic mutation and gene expression data to create cancer-type-specific significant co-expression networks (SCNs) and employed an enhanced clustering method called netNMF_HC for more accurate patient grouping.
  • Findings showed that this new approach outperformed the traditional network-based stratification (NBS) method, identifying important survival-related subtypes, especially in uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC), that were missed by the NBS method.

Article Abstract

The stratification of cancer into subtypes that are significantly associated with clinical outcomes is beneficial for targeted prognosis and treatment. In this study, we integrated somatic mutation and gene expression data to identify clusters of patients. In contrast to previous studies, we constructed cancer-type-specific significant co-expression networks (SCNs) rather than using a fixed gene network across all cancers, such as the network-based stratification (NBS) method, which ignores cancer heterogeneity. For each type of cancer, the gene expression data were used to construct the SCN network, while the gene somatic mutation data were mapped onto the network, propagated, and used for further clustering. For the clustering, we adopted an improved network-regularized non-negative matrix factorization (netNMF) (netNMF_HC) for a more precise classification. We applied our method to various datasets, including ovarian cancer (OV), lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC) cohorts derived from the TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) project. Based on the results, we evaluated the performance of our method to identify survival-relevant subtypes and further compared it to the NBS method, which adopts priori networks and netNMF algorithm. The proposed algorithm outperformed the NBS method in identifying informative cancer subtypes that were significantly associated with clinical outcomes in most cancer types we studied. In particular, our method identified survival-associated UCEC subtypes that were not identified by the NBS method. Our analysis indicated valid subtyping of patient could be applied by mutation data with cancer-type-specific SCNs and netNMF_HC for individual cancers because of specific cancer co-expression patterns and more precise clustering.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5433734PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0177662PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nbs method
16
somatic mutation
12
gene expression
12
expression data
12
mutation gene
8
cancer
8
cancer subtypes
8
subtypes associated
8
associated clinical
8
clinical outcomes
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!