A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

SU-E-T-422: Lung SBRT Using Cyberknife: Technique and Treatment Outcome. | LitMetric

Purpose: At East Carolina University, we have been treating primary and secondary lung cancers with Cyberknife stereotactic body radiotherapy (CK- SBRT) since February 2009. Till October 2011, we have treated a total of 79 patients (83 sites). In this study, we present our experience in CK-SBRT and clinical outcome of the treated patients.

Methods: Of the 79 patients, 43 were female; age of the whole patient population ranged 33.2-89.7yrs (median=73.2yrs). Patients treated for primary lung cancer (n=57) had severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and were not surgical candidates. Cyberknife robotic system with tracking techniques (Synchrony=52, XsiteLung=22, XsightSpine=5) were used. Majority of the patient (n=52) had multiple gold fiducials placed (1-6 placed; 1-4 tracked per patient) either percutaneously or bronchoscopically. CT images were used for dosimetric planning, by medical physicists, using Cyberknife MultiPlan software. Prescription doses were 25Gy-55Gy in 3-5 fractions (mean=48.2Gy, median=50Gy); doses were prescribed mainly to 80% isodoseline (range=75-96%, mean=81.4%). PTV margin varied from 0-7mm (mean±SD=3.2±1.4mm), based on the tumor locations; breathing patterns and cancer type. Dosimetric coverage of GTV and PTV were (mean±SD): 97.8±5% and 94.7±6.9%, respectively. The treatment response was assessed using either a CT or a PET scan or both.

Results: The median follow up was 13.1months (range 0.3-31.9 months). Overall response rate was 98.8% (CR=73.5%). Local failure free survival at one year was 84% for primary (n=57), 76% for recurrent (n=16) lung cancer and 100% for metastatic (n=10) tumors. The toxicity rate was low with one patient reported to have chest wall pain and one patient developed grade 3-4 radiation pneumonitis.

Conclusions: In most of the cases tight PTV margins were used. Since the prescriptions were at 80% isodeose line with more than 94% PTV coverage, the treatment outcome appeared reasonable. Further study relating PTV margin, dosimetric coverage, and treatment outcome is in progress.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4735511DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

treatment outcome
12
lung cancer
8
ptv margin
8
dosimetric coverage
8
coverage treatment
8
patient
5
ptv
5
su-e-t-422 lung
4
lung sbrt
4
cyberknife
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!