A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Evaluation of the effect of temperature variation on response of PRESAGE® dosimeter. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study focused on how different temperatures affect the response of the PRESAGE ® solid dosimeter, a device used for radiation measurement.
  • The dosimeter was made using specific chemical components, and its physical characteristics were compared to water, with tests conducted across a range of temperatures from -4°C to 90°C.
  • Results demonstrated that temperature variations do not impact the dosimeter's performance at temperatures below 75°C, while responses shift at higher temperatures, indicating important findings for its clinical use.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Many factors, such as PRESAGE ® composition, dose rate, energy, and type of radiation, temperature, etc., may effect on PRESAGE ® dosimeter response. The aim of this study was investigating the effect of temperature variation on response of PRESAGE ® solid dosimeter.

Materials And Methods: In this study, a PRESAGE ® solid detector was fabricated. Ninety-four percent weight polyurethane, 5% weight carbon tetrachloride, and 1% weight leucomalachite green were used. Radiological and physical characteristics of PRESAGEs ®, such as mass density, electron density, and effective number atomic were obtained and compared with water. Response of PRESAGE ® dosimeter in temperatures -4, 10, 25, 35, 45, 55, 65, 75, 85, and 90°C was evaluated. In addition, the absorption peak at various temperatures was investigated.

Results: The results showed that the absorption peak at different temperatures was in the range of 630-635 nm. For temperatures below 75°C, the results indicated that temperature variation has no effect on the response of PRESAGE ® dosimeter whereas at the temperatures> 75°C, temperature variation has an effect on PRESAGE ® dosimeter response.

Conclusion: The finding showed that temperature changes have not impact on the absorption peak. In addition, the results related to the effect of temperature variation on the response of PRESAGE ® dosimeter showed that in the range of clinical applications (temperatures below 75°C), temperature variation has no effect on PRESAGE ® dosimeter response.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-1482.199389DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

temperature variation
24
presage dosimeter
24
variation response
16
response presage
16
absorption peak
12
presage
9
dosimeter response
8
presage solid
8
peak temperatures
8
temperatures 75°c
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!