A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Splenic volume differentiates complicated and non-complicated celiac disease. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Studies indicate that splenic volume (SV) might be decreased in conditions like celiac disease (CD), refractory CD type II (RCD II), and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL).
  • The research involved a large cohort of 77 CD patients, 29 RCD II patients, 24 EATL patients, and 149 healthy controls, assessing SV using CT scans.
  • Results show that SV is significantly larger in uncomplicated CD patients compared to controls, while RCD II patients have a notably smaller SV, which may reflect their immune-compromised status.

Article Abstract

Background: Studies in small groups of patients indicated that splenic volume (SV) may be decreased in patients with celiac disease (CD), refractory CD (RCD) type II and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL).

Objective: The objective of this article is to evaluate SV in a large cohort of uncomplicated CD, RCD II and EATL patients and healthy controls.

Methods: The retrospective cohort consisted of 77 uncomplicated CD (of whom 39 in remission), 29 RCD II, 24 EATL and 12 patients with both RCD II and EATL. The control group included 149 healthy living kidney donors. SV was determined on computed tomography.

Results: The median SV in the uncomplicated CD group was significantly larger than in controls (202 cm (interquartile range (IQR): 154-275) versus 183 cm (IQR: 140-232),  = 0.02). After correction for body surface area, age and gender, the ratio of SV in uncomplicated CD versus controls was 1.28 (95% confidence interval: 1.20-1.36;  < 0.001). The median SV in RCD II patients (118 cm (IQR 83-181)) was smaller than the median SV in the control group ( < 0.001).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates large inter-individual variation in SV. SV is enlarged in uncomplicated CD. The small SV in RCD II may be of clinical relevance considering the immune-compromised status of these patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5415212PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050640616663571DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rcd eatl
12
splenic volume
8
celiac disease
8
eatl patients
8
volume differentiates
4
differentiates complicated
4
complicated non-complicated
4
non-complicated celiac
4
disease background
4
background studies
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!