Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: To determine whether patients do better with unsupervised (home-based) physiotherapy or in an outpatient setting.
Setting: Acute care public hospital in the region, supporting a population of ∼540,000.
Design: Single-blind randomized controlled trial.
Participants: Adult patients (N=98) after unilateral elective total hip replacement (THR) were randomly assigned to a supervised (center-based) exercise (n=56) or a unsupervised (home-based) exercise (n=42) program and followed for 6 months postsurgery.
Interventions: The supervised group attended a 4-week outpatient rehabilitation program supervised by a physiotherapist. The unsupervised group was given written and pictorial instructions to perform rehabilitation independently at home.
Main Outcome Measures: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index; Short-Form 36-item Health Questionnaire (SF-36) mental and physical component summary measures; University of California, Los Angeles activity scale; and timed Up and Go test.
Results: There were no differences between the groups for any measure. The overall differences between the adjusted means were as follows: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, 0.50 (95% confidence interval [CI], -6.8 to 5.7); SF-36 physical component summary, 0.8 (95% CI, -6.5 to 8.1); SF-36 mental component summary, 1.7 (95% CI, -4.1 to 7.4); University of California, Los Angeles activity scale, 0.3 (95% CI, 5.2 to 6.1); and timed Up and Go test, 0 seconds (95% CI, -1.4 to 1.3s).
Conclusions: The results demonstrated that outcomes in response to rehabilitation after THR are clinically and statistically similar whether the program was supervised or not. The results suggest that early rehabilitation programs can be effectively delivered unsupervised in the home to low-risk patients discharged home after THR. However, the relative effect of late-stage rehabilitation was not tested.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.03.032 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!