Background: Recovering hand function has important implications for improving independence of patients with tetraplegia after traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive neuromodulation technique that has potential to improve motor function.
Objective: To investigate the effects of one session of 1 mA, 2 mA, and sham anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) in the upper extremity (hand) motor performance (grasp and lease) in patients with chronic cervical SCI.
Methods: Eleven participants with incomplete SCI were randomized to receive 20 minutes of 1 mA, 2 mA, or sham stimulation over the targeted motor cortex over three separated sessions. Hand motor performance was measured by a hand robotic evaluation (kinematics) and the Box and Blocks (BB) test before and after the stimulation period.
Results: A significant improvement on the grasp mean to peak speed ratio (GMP) was observed in the 2 mA group (pre: 0.38±0.02; post: 0.43±0.03; mean±SEM; p = 0.031). There was no statistically significant difference in BB test results, however the 2 mA intervention showed a positive trend for improvement.
Conclusions: A single session of 2 mA of a-tDCS showed gains in hand motor function in patients with chronic SCI that were not observed in functional clinical scales. The use of robotic kinematics showed promising results in assessing small changes in motor performance. Further studies are necessary to determine whether tDCS can be an effective long-term rehabilitation strategy for individuals with SCI.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/NRE-171456 | DOI Listing |
Muscle Nerve
January 2025
International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Introduction/aims: Upper limb paralysis is arguably the most limiting consequence of cervical spinal cord injury (cSCI). There is limited knowledge regarding the early structural changes of muscles implicated in grasp/pinch function and upper extremity nerve transfer surgeries. We evaluated: (1) muscle size and echo intensity (EI) in subacute cSCI (2-6 months) and (2) the influence of lower motor neuron (LMN) damage on these ultrasound parameters.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBiomimetics (Basel)
January 2025
Faculty of Engineering, Tokyo Polytechnic University, 1583 Iiyama, Atsugi 243-0297, Kanagawa, Japan.
Wrist movements play a crucial role in upper-limb motor tasks. As prosthetic and robotic hand technologies have evolved, increasing attention has been focused on replicating the anatomy and functionality of the wrist. Closely imitating the biomechanics and movement mechanisms of human limbs is expected to enhance the overall performance of bionic robotic hands.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBrain Sci
January 2025
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
Background/aim: Currently, there are limited evidence-based protocols for improving upper extremity (UE) motor function after stroke. The Keys protocol, a distributed form of constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT), delivers CIMT components in fewer hours per day over an extended period, fitting outpatient rehabilitation schedules and third-party payor models. This pilot study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the Keys protocol in enhancing UE capacity and performance poststroke.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBrain Sci
December 2024
Department of Military Medical Psychology, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.
Motor imagery includes visual imagery and kinesthetic imagery, which are two strategies that exist for mental rotation and are currently widely studied. However, different mental rotation tests can lead to different strategic performances. There are also many research results where two different strategies appear simultaneously under the same task.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFQ J Exp Psychol (Hove)
January 2025
Centre for Motor Control, Faculty of Kinesiology & Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
The influence of gaze cues on target prioritization (reaction times (RTs)) and movement execution (movement trajectories) differs based on the ability of the human gaze cue model to manually interact with the targets. Whereas gaze cues consistently impacted RTs, movement trajectories may only be affected when the hands of the human model had the potential to interact with the target. However, the perceived ability to interact with the targets was confounded by the proximity between the model's hands and the targets.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!