Reliability and Validity Study of a Tool to Measure Cancer Stigma: Patient Version.

Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs

Medical Oncology Department, Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir Kâtip Celebi University, Cigli-Izmir, Turkey.

Published: January 2017

Objective: The aim of this methodological study is to establish the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of "A Questionnaire for Measuring Attitudes toward Cancer (Cancer Stigma) - Patient version."

Methods: The sample comprised oncology patients who had active cancer treatment. The construct validity was assessed using the confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis.

Results: The mean age of the participants was 54.9±12.3 years. In the confirmatory factor analysis, fit values were determined as comparative fit index = 0.93, goodness of fit index = 0.91, normed-fit index=0.91, and root mean square error of approximation RMSEA = 0.09 ( <0.05) (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin = 0.88, χ = 1084.41, Df = 66, and Barletta's test <0.000). The first factor was "impossibility of recovery and experience of social discrimination" and the second factor was "stereotypes of cancer patients." The two-factor structure accounted for 56.74% of the variance. The Cronbach's alpha value was determined as 0.88 for the two-factor scale.

Conclusions: "A questionnaire for measuring attitudes toward cancer (cancer stigma) - Patient version" is a reliable and valid questionnaire to assess stigmatization of cancer in cancer patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5412154PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/apjon.apjon_10_17DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cancer stigma
8
stigma patient
8
reliability validity
4
validity study
4
study tool
4
tool measure
4
cancer
4
measure cancer
4
patient version
4
version objective
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!