Evaluation and Selection of Quality Indicators for the Management of Endometrial Cancer.

Int J Gynecol Cancer

*Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique; †Sce Gynécologie Hôpital Bichat Claude Bernard, Paris; ‡Sce Gynécologie Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice; §Sce Gynécologie, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand; ∥Pôle d'Obstétrique Gynécologie Reproduction, Hôpital Pellegrin, Centre Aliénor d'Aquitaine, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux; ¶Sce de Chirurgie Oncologique 2, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; #Clinique de Chirurgie Gynécologique Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, CHRU de Lille, Université Lille Nord de France, Lille; **Sce Gynécologie, Hôpital Le Bocage CHU Dijon, Dijon; ††Sce Gynécologie, Hôpital Tenon Paris, Paris; ‡‡Sce Gynécologie, CHU Antoine Béclére, Clamart; §§Sce Gynécologie CHU Limoges, Limoges; ∥∥Sce Gynécologie, CH Lyon Sud, Lyon; ¶¶Sce Gynécologie, CH Poissy, Poissy; ##Sce Gynécologie, CHRU Bretonneau, Tours; ***Sce Gynécologie Institut Curie; and †††Sce Gynécologie Hôpital Bichat Claude Bernard, Paris, France.

Published: June 2017

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate 36 quality indicators (QIs) for assessing the quality of care in uterine cancer as part of the EFFECT project.
  • Thirteen out of 14 hospitals responded to a survey about the QIs, revealing that 25 of the 36 indicators affected less than 80% of patients, while 5 indicators were identified as improvable.
  • The analysis highlighted three key dimensions—outcome, safety, and perioperative management—suggesting that focusing on these 5 improvable QIs could effectively reflect the quality of care in managing endometrial cancer.

Article Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate 36 quality indicators (QIs) for monitoring the quality of care of uterine cancer to be implemented in the EFFECT (effectiveness of endometrial cancer treatment) project.

Methods: The 36 QIs were evaluated in the first 10 patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer and managed in 14 French hospitals in 2011. To assess the status of each QI, a questionnaire detailing the 36 QIs was sent to each hospital, and the information was cross-checked with information from the multidisciplinary staff meeting, surgical reports, and pathological reports. The QIs were evaluated in terms of measurability and improvability. The remaining QIs were evaluated with a multiple correspondence analysis to highlight the interrelationships between qualitative variables describing a population.

Results: Thirteen of the 14 institutions responded to the survey for a total of 130 patients. Twenty-five of the 36 QIs affected less than 80% of the patients. Thirteen QIs were found not to be improvable because they reached more than 95% of the theoretical target. Finally, 5 QIs concerning more than 80% of the patients were found to be improvable. The multiple correspondence analysis finally identified 3 dimensions-outcome, safety, and perioperative management-that included the 5 QIs.

Conclusions: In the present study, 5 of the 36 QIs suggested by the EFFECT project seem to be sufficient to report on the quality of endometrial cancer management. Further studies are needed to correlate the information provided by those 5 questions and the relevant outcomes reflecting quality of care in endometrial cancer.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000980DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

endometrial cancer
20
qis evaluated
12
qis
9
quality indicators
8
quality care
8
multiple correspondence
8
correspondence analysis
8
80% patients
8
cancer
6
quality
5

Similar Publications

Ovarian cancer has a poor prognosis, and screening methods have not been established. Biomarkers based on molecular genetic characteristics must be identified to develop diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for all cancer types, particularly ovarian cancer. The present study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of genetic analysis of cervical and endometrial liquid-based cytology (LBC) specimens for detecting somatic mutations in patients with ovarian cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Adaptive ChemoTherapy for Ovarian cancer (ACTOv) is a phase II, multicentre, randomised controlled trial, evaluating an adaptive therapy (AT) regimen with carboplatin in women with relapsed, platinum-sensitive high-grade serous or high-grade endometrioid cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube and peritoneum whose disease has progressed at least 6 months after day 1 of the last cycle of platinum-based chemotherapy. AT is a novel, evolutionarily informed approach to cancer treatment, which aims to exploit intratumoral competition between drug-sensitive and drug-resistant tumour subpopulations by modulating drug dose according to a patient's own response to the last round of treatment. ACTOv is the first clinical trial of AT in this disease setting.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Human kinesin family member 11 (KIF11) plays a vital role in regulating the cell cycle and is implicated in the tumorigenesis and progression of various cancers, but its role in endometrial cancer (EC) is still unclear. Our current research explored the prognostic value, biological function and targeting strategy of KIF11 in EC through approaches including bioinformatics, machine learning and experimental studies.

Methods: The GSE17025 dataset from the GEO database was analyzed via the limma package to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in EC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Advances in gynaecologic oncology research lead to continuous updates in clinical guidelines. However, undergraduate medical education often lacks in-depth coverage of recent developments, limiting students' preparedness for evidence-based management of gynaecological cancers. This study aimed to bridge the educational gap by integrating case-based analyses of practice-changing studies into the undergraduate obstetrics and gynaecology course.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Use of long-acting, reversible contraceptives has increased over the past 20 years, but an understanding of how they could influence cancer risk is limited.

Methods: We conducted a nested case-control study among a national cohort of Australian women (n = 176 601 diagnosed with cancer between 2004 and 2013; 882 999 matched control individuals) to investigate the associations between the levonorgestrel intrauterine system, etonogestrel implants, depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate and cancer risk and compared these results with the oral contraceptive pill. We used conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!