AI Article Synopsis

  • Oscillatory gene expression plays a vital role in multiple biological processes, but distinguishing between actual oscillations and random fluctuations in gene expression can be challenging due to the randomness inherent in individual cell dynamics.
  • A new statistical analysis method has been developed that integrates stochastic modeling with Gaussian processes to effectively differentiate between oscillatory and non-oscillatory gene expression in single-cell time series data, even amidst variations in amplitude and period.
  • This method has shown to outperform existing techniques and has been validated with both simulated data and real experimental results, demonstrating its capability to analyze any gene network and provide insights into the proportion and quality of oscillating cells.

Article Abstract

Multiple biological processes are driven by oscillatory gene expression at different time scales. Pulsatile dynamics are thought to be widespread, and single-cell live imaging of gene expression has lead to a surge of dynamic, possibly oscillatory, data for different gene networks. However, the regulation of gene expression at the level of an individual cell involves reactions between finite numbers of molecules, and this can result in inherent randomness in expression dynamics, which blurs the boundaries between aperiodic fluctuations and noisy oscillators. This underlies a new challenge to the experimentalist because neither intuition nor pre-existing methods work well for identifying oscillatory activity in noisy biological time series. Thus, there is an acute need for an objective statistical method for classifying whether an experimentally derived noisy time series is periodic. Here, we present a new data analysis method that combines mechanistic stochastic modelling with the powerful methods of non-parametric regression with Gaussian processes. Our method can distinguish oscillatory gene expression from random fluctuations of non-oscillatory expression in single-cell time series, despite peak-to-peak variability in period and amplitude of single-cell oscillations. We show that our method outperforms the Lomb-Scargle periodogram in successfully classifying cells as oscillatory or non-oscillatory in data simulated from a simple genetic oscillator model and in experimental data. Analysis of bioluminescent live-cell imaging shows a significantly greater number of oscillatory cells when luciferase is driven by a Hes1 promoter (10/19), which has previously been reported to oscillate, than the constitutive MoMuLV 5' LTR (MMLV) promoter (0/25). The method can be applied to data from any gene network to both quantify the proportion of oscillating cells within a population and to measure the period and quality of oscillations. It is publicly available as a MATLAB package.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5444866PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005479DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

time series
16
gene expression
16
single-cell live
8
live imaging
8
gaussian processes
8
oscillatory gene
8
data gene
8
data analysis
8
oscillatory
6
gene
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!