Factors Related to Implementation and Reach of a Pragmatic Multisite Trial: The My Own Health Report (MOHR) Study.

J Am Board Fam Med

From the Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics & Environmental Science, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Dallas (BAB); the Implementation Science Team, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville MD (SH-R); Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX (SK); UNC Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (CLR); the Department of Health Promotion and Community Health Sciences, Texas A&M University School of Public Health, Oklahoma City, OK (KF); the Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (TTO-O); the Departments of Family Medicine & Community Health, Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Sociology, and Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (KCS); and New York Physicians against Cancer (NYPAC), New York (SSG).

Published: January 2018

Background: Contextual factors relevant to translating healthcare improvement interventions to different settings are rarely collected systematically. This study articulates a prospective method for assessing and describing contextual factors related to implementation and patient reach of a pragmatic trial in primary care.

Methods: In a qualitative case-series, contextual factors were assessed from the My Own Health Report (MOHR) study, focused on systematic health risk assessments and goal setting for unhealthy behaviors and behavioral health in nine primary care practices. Practice staff interviews and observations, guided by a context template were conducted prospectively at three time points. Patient reach was calculated as percentage of patients completing MOHR of those who were offered MOHR and themes describing contextual factors were summarized through an iterative, data immersion process.These included practice members' motivations towards MOHR, practice staff capacity for implementation, practice information system capacity, external resources to support quality improvement, community linkages, and implementation strategy fit with patient populations.

Conclusions: Systematically assessing contextual factors prospectively throughout implementation of quality improvement initiatives helps translation to other health care settings. Knowledge of contextual factors is essential for scaling up of effective interventions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5878922PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2017.03.160151DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

contextual factors
24
factors implementation
8
reach pragmatic
8
health report
8
report mohr
8
mohr study
8
describing contextual
8
patient reach
8
practice staff
8
quality improvement
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!