A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Clinical impact of cone beam computed tomography on iterative treatment planning during ultrasound-guided percutaneous ablation of liver malignancies. | LitMetric

A standardized cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) protocol may impact optimal ablation probe(s) positioning during ultrasound-guided microwave ablation (MWA). To evaluate this hypothesis, 15 patients underwent ultrasound-guided percutaneous MWA of 15 liver lesions (10 hepatocellular carcinomas, 5 metastasis ranging 11-41 mm) with the ultrasound guidance assisted by a dedicated CBCT protocol. Pre-procedural enhanced CBCT (ceCBCT) was performed after intravenous contrast administration to visualize the lesion and determine the optimal approach using CBCT-based ablation planning software. MW antennas were positioned under ultrasound guidance, and non-enhanced CBCT was performed after deployment and fused with pre-procedural ceCBCT to assess tumor targeting and modify subsequent steps of the procedure. CBCT lesion detection accuracy and number of needle repositioning on the basis of CBCT information were recorded. Clinical success was measured on 1-month follow-up contrast-enhanced CT. The target lesion was detected on ceCBCT in 13 out of 15 patients (87%). The undetected lesions were only visible on diagnostic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, which was then fused to the CBCT and fluoroscopy to facilitate targeting. MW antennas were repositioned on the basis of CBCT in 11 lesions (73%). Clinical success was achieved in 14/15 ablations (93%) with a mean follow-up of X months. The only case of local recurrence was expected, as the intent was tumor debulking. CBCT imaging during ultrasound-guided liver ablation is feasible and leads to ablation device repositioning in the majority of cases.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12032-017-0954-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cbct
9
cone beam
8
beam computed
8
computed tomography
8
ultrasound-guided percutaneous
8
cbct protocol
8
ultrasound guidance
8
basis cbct
8
clinical success
8
ablation
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!