AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) versus conformal radiation therapy (CRT) in treating malignant pleural mesothelioma, focusing on target coverage and lung dose limitations.
  • Results showed that IMRT provided significantly better target coverage and dose distribution, achieving full coverage in 100% of cases while CRT only managed 71.29%, highlighting IMRT's superiority in precision.
  • IMRT also succeeded in keeping lung dose levels within safe limits, demonstrating its potential to safely and effectively treat large tumor volumes associated with this type of cancer.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To investigate high conformality on target coverage and the ability on creating strict lung dose limitation of intensity-modulated radiation therapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Patients And Methods: Twenty-four radiation therapy plannings were evaluated and compared with dosimetric outcomes of conformal radiation therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Hemithoracal radiation therapy was performed on 12 patients with a fraction of 1.8 Gy to a total dose of 50.4 Gy. All organs at risk were contoured. Radiotherapy plannings were differed according to the technique; conformal radiation therapy was planned with conventionally combined photon-electron fields, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy was planned with 7 to 9 radiation beam angles optimized in inverse planning. Strict dose-volume constraints were applied.

Results: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy was statistically superior in target coverage and dose homogeneity (intensity-modulated radiation therapy-planning target volume 95 mean 100%; 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy-planning target volume 95 mean 71.29%, P = .0001; intensity-modulated radiation therapy-planning target volume 105 mean 11.14%; 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy-planning target volume 105 mean 35.69%, P = .001). The dosimetric results of the remaining lung was below the limitations on intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning data (intensity-modulated radiation therapy-lung mean dose mean 7.5 [range: 5.6%-8.5%]; intensity-modulated radiation therapy-lung V5 mean 55.55% [range: 47%-59.9%]; intensity-modulated radiation therapy-lung V20 mean 4.5% [range: 0.5%-9.5%]; intensity-modulated radiation therapy-lung V13 mean 13.43% [range: 4.2%-22.9%]).

Conclusion: With a complex and large target volume of malignant pleural mesothelioma, intensity-modulated radiation therapy has the ability to deliver efficient tumoricidal radiation dose within the safe dose limits of the remaining lung tissue.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5616048PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533034616678110DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intensity-modulated radiation
52
radiation therapy
44
radiation
20
target volume
20
conformal radiation
16
radiation therapy-planning
16
therapy-planning target
16
radiation therapy-lung
16
intensity-modulated
13
target coverage
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!