Purpose: Several factors have been associated with the prescription of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) over warfarin such as younger age, fewer concomitant medications, and lower CHADS2 or bleeding scores. The primary objective of this study was to identify predictors of DOAC choice compared with warfarin for patients who are starting a new oral anticoagulant (OAC) for atrial fibrillation (AF). The secondary objective was to describe the proportion of DOAC prescriptions in new users of OAC for AF.

Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in a teaching hospital in Canada. Medical records of adult patients hospitalized in any medical units between October 1st, 2011 and October 1st, 2014, who were newly prescribed an OAC for non valvular AF were systematically reviewed. Baseline characteristics of warfarin and DOAC users were compared and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was completed to identify predictors of DOAC use. Variables included in the multiple regression analysis were: age, hypertension, diabetes, history of stroke or transient ischemic attack, coronary artery disease, peripheral arterial disease, CHADS2 score of 2 or more, creatinine clearance 30mL/min or more, polypharmacy, concomitant use of ASA or clopidogrel, and prescription by a neurologist.

Results: Among OAC users (144 patients on DOAC and 295 patients on warfarin), older age (odds ratio [OR] 0.97; 95%CI 0.95-0.98), peripheral arterial disease (OR: O.41;95%CI: 0.21-0.82), polypharmacy (OR: 0.30;95%CI:0.10-0.89), and concomitant use of clopidogrel (OR: 0.19;95%CI:0.07-0.56) decreased the probability of DOAC use. Prescription by a neurologist (OR: 2.77;95%CI:1.34-5.76) and an estimated creatinine clearance of at least 30mL/min (OR: 3.53;95%CI:1.18-10.57) increased the likelihood of DOAC prescription.

Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first observational study finding that concomitant use of clopidogrel reduced the likelihood of DOAC utilization while prescription by a neurologist increased the probability of receiving a DOAC over warfarin in patients with AF.This article is open to POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW. Registered readers (see "For Readers") may comment by clicking on ABSTRACT on the issue's contents page.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.18433/J30W4FDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

doac
10
direct oral
8
oral anticoagulants
8
atrial fibrillation
8
doac warfarin
8
identify predictors
8
predictors doac
8
warfarin patients
8
october 1st
8
regression analysis
8

Similar Publications

Background: Off-label under- and overdosing of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is not uncommon in real-world practice.

Objective: This study aimed to identify efficacy and safety of off-label DOACs dose after AF ablation.

Methods: The RYOUMA registry was a prospective multicenter study of Japanese patients who underwent AF ablation between 2017 and 2018.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of using prophylactic direct oral anti-coagulants (DOAC) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) after major urologic surgery.

Materials And Methods: Systematic literature searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL were performed up to 9 November 2023, and protocols were registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024494424). The primary outcomes were post-operative incidence of VTE and bleeding.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The role of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the treatment of left ventricular thrombus (LVT) after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains uncertain.

Aims: We aimed to compare the effect of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in patients with STEMI complicated by LVT.

Methods: Adult patients with STEMI and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography showing LVT were assigned to rivaroxaban (15 mg once daily) or warfarin (international normalised ratio goal of 2.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Anticoagulant therapy, particularly the use of direct oral anticoagulant agents (DOACs), is recommended for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). This multicenter observational retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of DOACs compared to warfarin in Japanese patients aged 75 years and older with NVAF. Data from the Mie-Life Innovation Promotion Center Database were used to collect medical information on the patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) can lead to significant healthcare resource utilization (HcRU) and costs. First-line treatments such as direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) are utilized for VTE management. There are limited observational studies to determine which first-line drug for VTE is associated with lower HcRU and cost.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!