AI Article Synopsis

  • Cystic echinococcosis is a disease caused by the Echinococcus granulosus parasite, which has multiple genotypes, with G1-G3 being the most common in humans.
  • The study aims to clarify the genetic relationships and taxonomy of these genotypes by analyzing mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences from samples collected from various intermediate host species across multiple countries.
  • Findings suggest that G1 and G3 can be classified as a single species based on nuclear data, while G2 is not a distinct genotype and should be excluded from classification lists.

Article Abstract

Cystic echinococcosis, a zoonotic disease caused by Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato (s. l.), is a significant global public health concern. Echinococcus granulosus s. l. is currently divided into numerous genotypes (G1-G8 and G10) of which G1-G3 are the most frequently implicated genotypes in human infections. Although it has been suggested that G1-G3 could be regarded as a distinct species E. granulosus sensu stricto (s. s.), the evidence to support this is inconclusive. Most importantly, data from nuclear DNA that provide means to investigate the exchange of genetic material between G1-G3 is lacking as none of the published nuclear DNA studies have explicitly included G2 or G3. Moreover, the commonly used relatively short mtDNA sequences, including the complete cox1 gene, have not allowed unequivocal differentiation of genotypes G1-G3. Therefore, significantly longer mtDNA sequences are required to distinguish these genotypes with confidence. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the phylogenetic relations and taxonomy of genotypes G1-G3 using sequences of nearly complete mitogenomes (11,443bp) and three nuclear loci (2984bp). A total of 23 G1-G3 samples were analysed, originating from 5 intermediate host species in 10 countries. The mtDNA data demonstrate that genotypes G1 and G3 are distinct mitochondrial genotypes (separated by 37 mutations), whereas G2 is not a separate genotype or even a monophyletic cluster, but belongs to G3. Nuclear data revealed no genetic separation of G1 and G3, suggesting that these genotypes form a single species due to ongoing gene flow. We conclude that: (a) in the taxonomic sense, genotypes G1 and G3 can be treated as a single species E. granulosus s. s.; (b) genotypes G1 and G3 should be regarded as distinct genotypes only in the context of mitochondrial data; (c) we recommend excluding G2 from the genotype list.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2017.04.023DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

echinococcus granulosus
12
granulosus sensu
12
genotypes
11
sensu stricto
8
regarded distinct
8
species granulosus
8
nuclear dna
8
mtdna sequences
8
genotypes g1-g3
8
single species
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!