AI Article Synopsis

  • Biogeochemical simulation models help quantify how agricultural systems impact carbon (C) sequestration and greenhouse gas (GHG) dynamics, but differing models often show inconsistent predictions due to varying processes in their C and nitrogen (N) cycle equations.
  • A review of models used by the CN-MIP consortium identified issues like poorly defined pedo-climatic conditions (46.2% impact), limitations in management practice simulation (33.1% impact), and scale variations (20.7% impact) affecting model performance.
  • Future developments in modeling should focus on including factors like soil microbial biomass, the effects of nitrogen shortages on soil organic matter (SOM), and more accurate gas transport simulations in soil.

Article Abstract

Biogeochemical simulation models are important tools for describing and quantifying the contribution of agricultural systems to C sequestration and GHG source/sink status. The abundance of simulation tools developed over recent decades, however, creates a difficulty because predictions from different models show large variability. Discrepancies between the conclusions of different modelling studies are often ascribed to differences in the physical and biogeochemical processes incorporated in equations of C and N cycles and their interactions. Here we review the literature to determine the state-of-the-art in modelling agricultural (crop and grassland) systems. In order to carry out this study, we selected the range of biogeochemical models used by the CN-MIP consortium of FACCE-JPI (http://www.faccejpi.com): APSIM, CERES-EGC, DayCent, DNDC, DSSAT, EPIC, PaSim, RothC and STICS. In our analysis, these models were assessed for the quality and comprehensiveness of underlying processes related to pedo-climatic conditions and management practices, but also with respect to time and space of application, and for their accuracy in multiple contexts. Overall, it emerged that there is a possible impact of ill-defined pedo-climatic conditions in the unsatisfactory performance of the models (46.2%), followed by limitations in the algorithms simulating the effects of management practices (33.1%). The multiplicity of scales in both time and space is a fundamental feature, which explains the remaining weaknesses (i.e. 20.7%). Innovative aspects have been identified for future development of C and N models. They include the explicit representation of soil microbial biomass to drive soil organic matter turnover, the effect of N shortage on SOM decomposition, the improvements related to the production and consumption of gases and an adequate simulations of gas transport in soil. On these bases, the assessment of trends and gaps in the modelling approaches currently employed to represent biogeochemical cycles in crop and grassland systems appears an essential step for future research.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.208DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

crop grassland
8
grassland systems
8
pedo-climatic conditions
8
management practices
8
time space
8
models
7
review analysis
4
analysis strengths
4
strengths weaknesses
4
weaknesses agro-ecosystem
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!