Background: The purpose of this study was to look for differences in mechanism, radiographic findings, and treatment between mallet fractures of the thumb and mallet fractures of the index through small fingers.

Methods: This retrospective study included 24 mallet fractures of the thumb and 392 mallet fractures of other digits. We compared demographics, injury factors (side, dominant hand, time between injury and first visit, and injury mechanism), subluxation, fragment size, treatment, and time from injury to final evaluation between the 2 groups.

Results: Mallet fractures of the thumb presented for treatment sooner after injury (2.9 vs 13 days on average), had less fragment displacement (27% vs 33%), and less articular involvement (39% vs 46% on average). None of the mallet fractures of the thumb had radiographic evidence of subluxation, whereas 25% of mallet fractures of other fingers had initial or later subluxation.

Conclusions: Mallet fractures of the thumb are not likely to subluxate.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5480675PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1558944716672192DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mallet fractures
40
fractures thumb
24
mallet
10
fractures
9
fractures fingers
8
time injury
8
thumb
6
injury
5
thumb compared
4
compared mallet
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!