Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use and Its Association with Emotional Status and Quality of Life in Patients with a Solid Tumor: A Cross-Sectional Study.

J Altern Complement Med

2 School of Medicine, Pusan National University, and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea .

Published: May 2017

AI Article Synopsis

  • - A study conducted at a cancer center in Korea found that 60.6% of the 216 patients with solid tumors reported using complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), primarily herbal medicine.
  • - CAM users were typically younger, more educated, and had higher income levels. They also exhibited less anxiety and depression compared to non-CAM users.
  • - Although CAM use was linked to reduced anxiety and depression, it did not significantly impact the quality of life (QOL) of the patients in this study.

Article Abstract

Objectives: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has been used widely in various populations for various purposes, including emotional support and improvement of quality of life (QOL). However, CAM use and purposes for using CAM are less clear among Korean patients with a solid tumor. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and type of CAM use, and the association between CAM use and anxiety, depression, and QOL in patients with a solid tumor.

Design: A cross-sectional survey.

Setting: A cancer center in Korea.

Subjects: Two hundred and sixteen patients diagnosed with a solid tumor.

Outcome Measures: Standard questionnaires on CAM use, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30.

Results: One hundred thirty one patients (60.6%) reported using CAM. CAM users, compared with non-CAM users, were significantly younger (57.8 vs. 60.9 years, p = 0.05), had higher level of education (p = 0.008), had higher income (p = 0.008), were less likely to seek physician consultation on CAM use (p = 0.002), and had a more advanced stage of tumor (p = 0.003) with more distant metastasis (p = 0.001). The most commonly used CAM was herbal medicine (n = 89, 67.9%). CAM users had significantly lower anxiety (t = 5.21, p < 0.001) and depression (t = 4.90, p < 0.001) than non-CAM users. When the effects of CAM use were tested on anxiety, depression, and QOL, controlling for covariates, CAM use was significantly associated with 8.7% and 8.8% of variance in decreasing anxiety and depression, but there was no unique association of CAM use with variance in QOL.

Conclusions: CAM use is prevalent and younger age, higher education levels, higher income, less physician consultation, and higher cancer stage are significant correlates to CAM use. Controlling for covariates (e.g., gender, BMI), CAM use is significantly associated with lower anxiety and depression compared with those of non-CAM users.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5446597PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/acm.2016.0289DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients solid
12
cam
11
complementary alternative
8
alternative medicine
8
quality life
8
solid tumor
8
anxiety depression
8
cam users
8
patients
5
medicine association
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!