Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: The anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibody has showed promising results in various cancers via enhancing T cell functions. However, many questions remain in the role and safety in previously-treated, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis incorporating all available evidences to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody compared with chemotherapy.
Methods: PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library database were searched for the studies about the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody in previously-treated, progressive NSCLC patients. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody with conventional chemotherapy in NSCLC were included. Overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat population was the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were: progression-free survival (PFS) in the intention-to-treat population, objective response rate (ORR), the incidence of adverse events, OS and PFS in different PD-L1 expression subgroups.
Results: Four trials with a total of 2,174 patients were included. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody showed a significant benefit to OS in the intention-to-treat population [combined hazard ratio (HR) 0.67; 95% CI: 0.61-0.75, P<0.00001], a 33% reduction in the relative risk of death. PFS also favored anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody (HR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.70-0.95, P=0.009). The ORR was significantly higher with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody than those with chemotherapy (RR of nonresponse, 0.92; 95% CI: 0.89-0.95, P<0.00001). Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody was associated with greater efficacy than chemotherapy across the end points of OS and PFS when tumor PD-L1 expression scored ≥1%, ≥5%, and ≥50%, except for tumor PD-L1 expression scored <1%. The group receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody had lower rates of treatment-related adverse events of any grade (RR 0.77; 95% CI: 0.73-0.81, P<0.00001) and treatment-related adverse events of grade 3-5 (RR 0.24; 95% CI: 0.14-0.41, P<0.00001).
Conclusions: Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody significantly improved survival compared with chemotherapy in previously-treated, progressive NSCLC patients. Besides, it also had a better safety profile.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5393989 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.03.104 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!