Aim: This study aims to investigate disparities in seclusion between Māori and non-Māori non-Pacific (nMnP) adults in mental health inpatient units in New Zealand.
Method: This study uses data on 7,239 inpatient psychiatric admissions and 782 seclusion events for nine district health boards (servicing 39% of the New Zealand population) for the period 1 July 2008 to 30 June 2010, from a New Zealand Ministry of Health dataset (PRIMHD). We calculate the age-standardised rates of seclusion per monthly inpatient admissions. Regression modelling of seclusion event rate ratios for Māori compared to nMnP adjusted for age, gender, socioeconomic deprivation (NZDep2006), legal status, referral pathway and diagnosis.
Results: Māori psychiatric inpatients are 39% more likely to experience a seclusion episode than nMnP adults in New Zealand. Important contributors to the disparity in seclusion rates between Māori and nMnP were age and legal status on admission. Adjustment for a range of demographic and admission variables accounted for part of the measured disparity between Māori and nMnP (RR 1.33, fully adjusted).
Conclusions: To reduce seclusion use for Māori, community mental health services responsive to Māori needs are required to prevent the need for inpatient admission, and reduce the acuity of illness where admission is required.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Healthcare (Basel)
December 2024
Faculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, 2375 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, QC H3T 1A8, Canada.
Background/objectives: Coercion in mental health is challenged, prompting reduction interventions. Among those, the Joint Crisis Plan (JCP), which aims to document individuals' treatment preferences in case of future de-compensation, regardless of the potential loss of discernment, has been identified as a key path to study. Identified challenges related to its implementation highlight the need to adapt this intervention to the local context.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTijdschr Psychiatr
January 2025
Background: The Lovisenberg Diakonal Hospital recently introduced an Open-Door Policy in their (formerly) closed psychiatric admission wards for people with a forced admission to an acute psychiatric crisis. Their modern mental health care system is remarkably similar to the Dutch healthcare organization, with shared values and standards, and provides good grounds for an implementation of an Open-Doors Policy in the Netherlands.
Aim: Gaining inspiration to reduce seclusion and create a new quality development and assessment process for closed admission departments in the Dutch mental health care system.
Int J Qual Health Care
January 2025
NGO Mental Health Initiative, Lithuanian Tobacco and Alcohol Control Coalition, Stiklių g. 8, Vilnius LT-01131, Lithuania.
Lithuania ratified the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) in 2010 and started deinstitutionalization in 2014. This reform covers segregated social care institutions where persons with mental health conditions, psychosocial, and/or intellectual disabilities live. It aims to move away from institutional care and towards community-based services.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Forensic Nurs
December 2024
Author Affiliations:Forensic Mental Health Research Unit, Middelfart, Faculty of Health Science, Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark.
Background: Although hotly disputed, coercive measures are widely used in mental health services globally. In Denmark, to ensure the rights of patients, special psychiatric legislation that emphasizes the imperative to always use the least intrusive intervention has been implemented. This raises the question of which coercive measures are perceived as being less intrusive than others.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWorld J Psychiatry
December 2024
Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.
This editorial examines the application of virtual reality (VR) training to mitigate restrictive practices (RPs) within psychiatric facilities. RPs include physical restraints, seclusion, and chemical restraints, used to ensure patient safety but with varying usage rates across regions. In recent years, there has been a growing focus on the adverse effects of RPs on both healthcare workers and patients, leading to calls for its reduction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!