AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the relationship between back asymmetry, measured by surface topography, and spinal deformity, quantified by the Cobb angle, in adolescents with scoliosis.
  • The Cobb angle, while a standard metric for diagnosing scoliosis, doesn't fully capture the three-dimensional nature of the deformity and carries risks from radiation exposure.
  • Results show significant correlations between various topographic and radiographic measures, indicating that back surface topography may provide useful supplementary information, although it cannot replace traditional X-rays in diagnosing scoliosis.

Article Abstract

Study Design: Optical cross-sectional study.

Purpose: To study the correlation between asymmetry of the back (measured by means of surface topography) and deformity of the spine (quantified by the Cobb angle).

Overview Of Literature: The Cobb angle is considered the gold standard in diagnosis and follow-up of scoliosis but does not correctly characterize the three-dimensional deformity of scoliosis. Furthermore, the exposure to ionizing radiation may cause harmful effects particularly during the growth stage, including breast cancer and other tumors.

Methods: Patients aged 13.15±1.96 years (range, 7-17 years; n=88) with Cobb angle greater than 10° were evaluated with X-rays and our back surface topography method through three variables: axial plane (DHOPI), coronal plane (POTSI), and profile plane (PC). Pearson's correlation was applied to determine the correlation between topographic and radiographic variables. One-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni correction were used to compare groups with different grades of scoliosis. Significance was set at <0.01 and, in some cases, at <0.05.

Results: We detected a positive, statistically significant correlation between Cobb angle with DHOPI (=0.810) and POTSI (=0.629) and between PC variables with thoracic kyphosis angle (=0.453) and lordosis lumbar angle (=0.275). In addition, we found statistically significant differences for DHOPI and POTSI variables according to the grade of scoliosis.

Conclusions: Although the back surface topography method cannot substitute for radiographs in the diagnosis of scoliosis, correlations between radiographic and topographic parameters suggest that it offers additional quantitative data that may complement radiologic study.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5401836PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2017.11.2.219DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

surface topography
12
correlation topographic
8
radiographic variables
8
cobb angle
8
correlation
4
topographic parameters
4
parameters surface
4
topography based
4
based structured
4
structured light
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!