Background: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) has become one of the standard techniques for approaching ipsilateral decompression, anterior column fusion, and posterior stabilization. This procedure is usually accompanied by the placement of bilateral transpedicular screws in the corresponding segment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of unilateral screw fixation compared with bilateral fixation in patients diagnosed with low-grade symptomatic lumbar spondylolisthesis who underwent an MI-TLIF technique.

Methods: A prospective and comparative study was performed in 67 patients with grade 1 symptomatic lumbar spondylolisthesis. The sample was allocated on both unilateral fixation group (n=33) and bilateral fixation group (n=34). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analogue scale (VAS) for leg and back pain, and Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36), preoperatively, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Changes over time and differences between the groups were analyzed. Statistical analyses included: Friedman test, Student's -test and Mann-Whitney's U. A two-tailed P value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results: During 1-year of evaluation there were no significant clinical differences between both groups.

Conclusions: Patients with grade 1 symptomatic lumbar spondylolisthesis treated with MI-TLIF with unilateral screw fixation had similar clinical results than those treated with bilateral fixation at 12 months postoperatively.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5386907PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jss.2017.03.04DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lumbar spondylolisthesis
12
bilateral transpedicular
8
bilateral fixation
8
symptomatic lumbar
8
fixation group
8
fixation
5
prospective clinical
4
clinical study
4
study comparing
4
comparing mi-tlif
4

Similar Publications

Objective: Controversy exists regarding treatment of symptomatic low-grade spondylolisthesis (LGS). Both one- and two-stage fusions are commonly performed, but it is unclear if one approach is superior. We aim to compare the satisfaction rates and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with LGS undergoing one- versus two-stage lumbar spine surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To explore characteristics, management strategies and preventive measures of fusion device displacement after oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) in treating lumbar lesions.

Methods: The clinical data of 12 patients with fusion device displacement after OLIF for lumbar lesions in 4 medical centers from October 2014 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed, including 4 males and 8 females, aged from 53 to 81 years old;2 patients with lumbar disc degeneration, 4 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, 3 patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis and 3 patients with lumbar degenerative kyphosis;preoperative dual-energy X-ray bone mineral density (BMD) was detected in 1 patient with T-value > -1 SD, 5 patients with T-value >-1~-2.5 SD, and 6 patients with T-value <-2.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis treated by posterolateral transarticular puncture lumbar interbody fusion under full visual endoscopy].

Zhongguo Gu Shang

December 2024

Department of Spine Surgery, Yichang Central People's Hospital, the First College of Clinical Science, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443008, Hubei, China.

Objective: To explore clinical effect of percutaneous endoscopic posterolateral trans-facet lumbar interbody fusion (PE-PTLIF) in treating degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Methods: The data of 38 patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis treated with PE-PTLIF from December 2019 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed, including 18 males and 20 females, aged from 39 to 75 years old with an average of (60.2±8.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Study Design: Retrospective review.

Objective: This study aims to compare postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in predominant back pain (PBP) versus predominant leg pain (PLP) patients following lumbar fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS).

Summary Of Background Data: Prior studies comparing PROMs in patients undergoing lumbar fusion with PBP versus PLP symptoms have included heterogeneous spinal pathology and restricted analysis to posterior fusion techniques.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Prior studies have linked sarcopenia and fat infiltration in paraspinal muscles with lumbar pain, spinal pathology, and adverse postoperative outcomes in lumbar spine surgery. A recent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based method for assessing muscle health, incorporating parameters such as Goutallier Classification (GC) and the Paralumbar Muscle Cross-Sectional Area to Body Mass Index ratio (PL-CSA/BMI), has shown that higher muscle grades correlate with significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes. Despite these advancements, there is limited research on the associations between paralumbar muscle health and factors such as age, BMI, walking tolerability, and spondylolisthesis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!