An overview of geophysical technologies appropriate for characterization and monitoring at fractured-rock sites.

J Environ Manage

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, 944 E. Harmon Ave., Las Vegas, NV, USA.

Published: December 2017

AI Article Synopsis

  • Geophysical methods are becoming increasingly important for understanding and monitoring fractured-rock aquifers, aiding groundwater remediation efforts despite challenges posed by their complexity.
  • Many remediation professionals face difficulties as geophysical results often require interpretation to relate them to critical properties, leading to a need for more practical demonstrations of these methods in real-life scenarios.
  • The article aims to enhance the use of geophysical methods by providing a summary of these techniques, reviewing case studies, and discussing best practices for method selection based on modeling and decision support tools.

Article Abstract

Geophysical methods are used increasingly for characterization and monitoring at remediation sites in fractured-rock aquifers. The complex heterogeneity of fractured rock poses enormous challenges to groundwater remediation professionals, and new methods are needed to cost-effectively infer fracture and fracture-zone locations, orientations and properties, and to develop conceptual site models for flow and transport. Despite the potential of geophysical methods to "see" between boreholes, two issues have impeded the adoption of geophysical methods by remediation professionals. First, geophysical results are commonly only indirectly related to the properties of interest (e.g., permeability) to remediation professionals, and qualitative or quantitative interpretation is required to convert geophysical results to hydrogeologic information. Additional demonstration/evaluation projects are needed in the site remediation literature to fully transfer geophysical methods from research to practice. Second, geophysical methods are commonly viewed as inherently risky by remediation professionals. Although it is widely understood that a given method may or may not work at a particular site, the reasons are not always clear to end users of geophysical products. Synthetic modeling tools are used in research to assess the potential of a particular method to successfully image a target, but these tools are not widely used in industry. Here, we seek to advance the application of geophysical methods to solve problems facing remediation professionals with respect to fractured-rock aquifers. To this end, we (1) provide an overview of geophysical methods applied to characterization and monitoring of fractured-rock aquifers; (2) review case studies showcasing different geophysical methods; and (3) discuss best practices for method selection and rejection based on synthetic modeling and decision support tools.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5894821PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.033DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

geophysical methods
32
remediation professionals
20
characterization monitoring
12
fractured-rock aquifers
12
geophysical
11
methods
9
overview geophysical
8
monitoring fractured-rock
8
synthetic modeling
8
remediation
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!