Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Current biopsy planning based on contrast-enhanced T1W (CET1W) or FLAIR sequences frequently delivers biopsy samples that are not in concordance with the gross tumor diagnosis. This study investigates whether the quantitative information of transfer constant K maps derived from T1W dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) can help enhance the quality of biopsy target selection in glioma. 28 patients with suspected glioma received MRI including DCE-MRI and a standard neuronavigation protocol of 3D FLAIR- and CET1W data sets (0.1 mmol/kg gadobutrol) at 3.0 T. After exclusion of five cases with no K-elevation, 2-6 biopsy targets were independently selected by a neurosurgeon (samples based on standard imaging) and a neuroradiologist (samples based on kinetic parameter K) per case and tissue samples corresponding to these targets were collected by a separate independent neurosurgeon. Standard technique and K-based samples were rated for diagnostic concordance with the gross tumor resection reference diagnosis (67 WHO IV; 24 WHO III and II) by a neuropathologist blinded for selection mode. K-based sample targets differed from standard technique sample targets in 90/91 cases. More K-based than standard imaging-based samples could be extracted. Diagnoses from K-based samples were more frequently concordant with the reference gross tumor diagnoses than those from standard imaging-based samples (WHO IV: 30/39 vs. 11/20; p = 0.08; WHO III/II: 12/13 vs. 6/11; p = 0.06). In 4/5 non-contrast-enhancing gliomas, K-based selection revealed significantly more accurate samples than standard technique sample-selection (10/12 vs. 2/8 samples; p = 0.02). If K elevation is present, K-based biopsy targeting provides significantly more diagnostic tissue samples in non-contrast-enhancing glioma than selection based on CET1W and FLAIR-weighted images alone.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2424-x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!