The role of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in stage IIIC endometrial cancer: A single-institute study.

The therapeutic value of para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PAL) in women with endometrial cancer (EC) remains uncertain. We retrospectively analysed 25 patients with stage IIIc EC (17 stage IIIC1; 8 IIIC2) who were treated in our institution. All subjects had undergone pelvic lymphadenectomies in which para-aortic nodes were sampled, or removed only when these nodes were enlarged. Sampling of para-aortic nodes or PAL was performed in all patients with stage IIIC2 disease and one of 17 with stage IIIC1 disease. Para-aortic lymph nodes were the most frequent site of recurrence in stage IIIC1 patients, but no such recurrences occurred in stage IIIC2 patients. Overall survival tended to be shorter in stage IIIC1 patients than stage IIIC2 patients. Our findings indicate that PAL improves the outcomes of patients with EC and high risk of para-aortic lymph node metastasis, such as those with positive pelvic lymph nodes or enlargement of para-aortic lymph nodes. Impact statement Para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastases are important prognostic factors in endometrial cancer. Overall survival of patients with stage IIIC1 disease is generally longer than for those with stage IIIC2 disease. Retrospective studies - but no prospective studies - have suggested that para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PAL) provides a survival benefit. In our institution, we had performed PAL or para-aortic sampling for patients with enlarged PALNs; therefore, as most IIIC1 patients had no enlarged PALNs, they underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy only, whereas all IIIC2 patients had enlarged PALNs and underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy and PAL or PALN sampling in addition to pelvic lymphadenectomy. However, under this policy, survival of stage IIIC1 patients was not better than for stage IIIC2 patients. Our retrospective study indicates a survival benefit for PAL in patients with pelvic node-positive or enlarged PALN. PAL warrants a prospective randomised trial to see whether it should be a standard treatment in these patients.