A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Predictors of differential PTSD treatment outcomes between veteran and civilian women after cognitive processing therapy. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • This study compared PTSD treatment responses between women veterans and civilians, finding civilians showed greater improvement despite similar initial severity scores.
  • Veterans scored significantly higher on the PTSD symptom measure (CAPS) after treatment, indicating a worse treatment response.
  • The research identified negative posttraumatic cognitions and lower treatment expectancies in veterans as key factors explaining the difference in treatment outcomes.

Article Abstract

Objective: This study used data from a recent randomized clinical trial (RCT) that found differences between women veterans and civilians in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) treatment response, with civilians demonstrating greater improvement than did veterans. Despite having similar PTSD severity scores at baseline, veterans scored roughly 18 points higher than civilians did on the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) at posttreatment (p < .01). This study sought to identify the clinical and treatment variables that were associated with the differential response to treatment demonstrated by the women in the RCT.

Method: Veteran (n = 21) and civilian (n = 105) women with PTSD received cognitive processing therapy (CPT) for PTSD. These secondary data analyses used structural equation modeling to investigate the role of 7 clinical and treatment variables to explain the reduced treatment response to CPT in veterans compared to civilians.

Results: Using structural equation modeling, we found that differences in CAPS scores at posttreatment were largely mediated by negative posttraumatic cognitions, as measured by the Posttraumatic Cognition Inventory (PTCI). Although veterans and civilians had similar PTCI scores at baseline, civilians had significantly lower PTCI scores at posttreatment, which predicted lower CAPS scores at posttreatment. This mediation appeared to be at least in part explained by lower treatment expectancies by veterans compared to civilians.

Conclusions: Future research should be focused on further understanding and addressing these 2 treatment outcome predictors in an effort to reduce the gap in PTSD treatment outcomes between veterans and civilians. (PsycINFO Database Record

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/tra0000266DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ptsd treatment
12
veterans civilians
12
scores posttreatment
12
treatment
9
treatment outcomes
8
veteran civilian
8
cognitive processing
8
processing therapy
8
treatment response
8
scores baseline
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!