The gap between entitlement and access to healthcare: An analysis of "candidacy" in the help-seeking trajectories of asylum seekers in Montreal.

Soc Sci Med

SHERPA Research Centre, CIUSSS Centre-Ouest de l'Ile de Montréal, CLSC Parc Extension, 7085, Rue Hutchison, Montréal, QC H3N 1Y9, Canada; Division of Social and Transcultural Psychiatry, McGill University, 1033 Pine Avenue West, Montréal, QC H3A 1A1, Canada. Electronic address:

Published: June 2017

AI Article Synopsis

  • In 2012, the Canadian government cut its federal refugee health coverage, which, while not greatly affecting asylum seekers in Quebec, led to reduced healthcare access due to polarized public debate.
  • A study using the "candidacy" model of healthcare access highlighted significant barriers faced by asylum seekers in Montreal, including confusion about coverage, complicated bureaucratic processes, and long wait times.
  • Feelings of marginalization tied to their uncertain migratory status exacerbated these barriers, leading to decreased self-advocacy and increased perceptions of healthcare professionals' unwillingness to assist them, demonstrating the harmful impact of negative public attitudes towards migrants on their health outcomes.

Article Abstract

In 2012 the Canadian government made significant cuts to its historically strong federal refugee health coverage plan. While this policy had negligible effects on the level of coverage provided to asylum seekers in Quebec, there is evidence that this group nonetheless experienced reduced healthcare access during the period of polarized national debate that ensued. This study engaged the "candidacy" model of healthcare access to illuminate factors contributing to the observed gap between entitlement and access. Twenty-five semi-structured interviews were conducted with asylum seekers in Montreal to elicit narrative accounts of difficulties encountered in the pursuit of healthcare. Thematic content analysis in conjunction with a holistic examination of help-seeking trajectories revealed several important barriers to obtaining care, including widespread confusion and misinformation about refugee health coverage, cumbersome administrative procedures specific to asylum seekers, and long wait times. Feelings of marginalization and insecurity associated with precarious migratory status appeared to amplify the effects of these barriers to care such that even a minor access difficulty could have dramatic effects on future help-seeking and access outcomes. Demonstrating awareness of public discourses interrogating their deservingness of health coverage, participants often interpreted access difficulties as evidence of health professionals' unwillingness to serve them. Such interpretations conspired with fears associated with the asylum claim process to suppress self-advocacy, further help-seeking, and at times even information-seeking. This finding is particularly significant in that it suggests a mechanism through which hostile public representations of forced migrants-increasingly prevalent in Western host countries-can themselves endanger the physical, psychological, and social health of highly disadvantaged populations, even in the presence of strong entitlement policies. We close with reflections on how theoretical models of healthcare access might be adjusted to better accommodate the unique experiences of precarious status migrants.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.038DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

asylum seekers
16
health coverage
12
healthcare access
12
gap entitlement
8
access
8
entitlement access
8
help-seeking trajectories
8
seekers montreal
8
refugee health
8
healthcare
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!