Comparative Effectiveness of Surgical Treatments for Small Renal Masses.

Urol Clin North Am

Department of Urology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; Center of Health Outcomes and Quality, Urology Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA; Cancer Outcomes and Public Policy Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. Electronic address:

Published: May 2017

In the management of small renal masses (SRMs), treatment options include partial nephrectomy (PN), radical nephrectomy (RN), ablation, renal biopsy, and active surveillance. Large series retrospective and meta-analyses demonstrate PN may confer greater preservation of renal function, overall survival, and equivalent cancer control when compared with RN. As newer therapies emerge, we should critically evaluate the risks and benefits associated with the surgical management of SRMs among patients with competing comorbidities, complex tumors, and high-risk disease. Among younger patients with SRMs amenable to resection, optimization of postoperative patient health should be prioritized.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2016.12.011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

small renal
8
renal masses
8
comparative effectiveness
4
effectiveness surgical
4
surgical treatments
4
treatments small
4
renal
4
masses management
4
management small
4
masses srms
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!