A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Evaluation of Impacting Factors on Facial Bone Thickness in the Anterior Maxillary Region. | LitMetric

Evaluation of Impacting Factors on Facial Bone Thickness in the Anterior Maxillary Region.

J Craniofac Surg

*Department of Periodontics, Islamic Azad University Tehran, Tehran Dental Branch, Iran†Private Practice‡Unit of Oral Surgery and Implant-Prosthetic Rehabilitation, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.

Published: May 2017

Background: The goal of the current study was to measure the width of the labial alveolar bone of the overlying maxillary anterior teeth, based on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, and the distance between cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and bone crest in adult patients.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed using a sample of 132 tomographic scans. Intact maxillary anterior with healthy periodontium and teeth was randomly selected and afterwards assessed by 2 calibrated and independent reviewers.

Result: The average bone thickness at 2 mm from the CEJ of the maxillary right central incisors was 0.63 ± 0.69 mm and over the maxillary left central incisors was 0.59 ± 0.71 mm. Moreover on the right and left lateral maxillary incisors, the crestal bone width averaged 0.64 ± 0.81 and 0.61 ± 0.7 mm, respectively. Concerning the maxillary canine region on both sides, the crestal bone thickness averaged 0.72 ± 0.9 and 0.66 ± 0.69 mm, in the maxillary right and left the canine regions, respectively. Furthermore, according to the gender and systemic disease, there were some recognizable differences in the facial bone thickness between the left and the right side.

Conclusions: The current study has advocated the outcome of a mostly thin buccal bone overlying the maxillary anterior teeth; hence, clinicians should always consider the thickness of the facial cortical plate of the extraction site and the positioning of the implant placement in the socket.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003643DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bone thickness
16
maxillary anterior
12
maxillary
9
bone
8
facial bone
8
current study
8
bone overlying
8
overlying maxillary
8
anterior teeth
8
central incisors
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!